ติดตั้ง Steam
เข้าสู่ระบบ
|
ภาษา
简体中文 (จีนตัวย่อ)
繁體中文 (จีนตัวเต็ม)
日本語 (ญี่ปุ่น)
한국어 (เกาหลี)
български (บัลแกเรีย)
Čeština (เช็ก)
Dansk (เดนมาร์ก)
Deutsch (เยอรมัน)
English (อังกฤษ)
Español - España (สเปน)
Español - Latinoamérica (สเปน - ลาตินอเมริกา)
Ελληνικά (กรีก)
Français (ฝรั่งเศส)
Italiano (อิตาลี)
Bahasa Indonesia (อินโดนีเซีย)
Magyar (ฮังการี)
Nederlands (ดัตช์)
Norsk (นอร์เวย์)
Polski (โปแลนด์)
Português (โปรตุเกส - โปรตุเกส)
Português - Brasil (โปรตุเกส - บราซิล)
Română (โรมาเนีย)
Русский (รัสเซีย)
Suomi (ฟินแลนด์)
Svenska (สวีเดน)
Türkçe (ตุรกี)
Tiếng Việt (เวียดนาม)
Українська (ยูเครน)
รายงานปัญหาเกี่ยวกับการแปลภาษา
กฎและแนวทางปฏิบัติในกระดานสนทนา
1 
รายงานโพสต์นี้
If I could I would give you a thumbs up...
RIP
and there are more Star Trek TV series
I do see the irony in saying Star Wars has no hope, but the universe of Star Wars is set - by George Lucas - in a perpetual state of recycling good and evil. This is further enhanced by the games, which explore the rise and fall of the Sith and the Jedi. Over and over and over again. The same mistakes, in an unending cycle.
Anakin does bring balance to the Force, as foretold, because he obliterates the Jedi. The Jedi who had their thumb on the galactic roulette wheel, always pushing light and suppressing dark. His kid swings it the other direction, and Luke's nephew the other direction (and all of them being whiny little ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ in the process, god I hate the Skywalkers).
So absolutely nothing you do, good or evil, matters. The destruction of Alderan, the destruction of the Death Stars. None of it matters. It is a universe devoid of hope, because the cycle always repeats. Of course The Force Awakens is just a retread of New Hope - by design, that universe just repeats ad infinitum.
Star Trek however was born of the hippie trippy '60s, and while it's mostly shed that, the idealism, the hope remains. The idea that we could actually transcend our violent, greedy nature, and build something wonderful, something positive. Hope. In the face of nuclear annihilation, racism, poverty. All the ills of the real world, seemingly without solution. Star Trek gives us the hope that there's a solution.
We joined Starfleet to dive headfirst into the unknown, decries Brad Boimler, explorers, not soldiers, not conquerors. I hate Sisco as much as I hate Section 31, and apparently anyone who makes the rank of admiral, because they're all the antithesis of the ideals of the Federation, they all chose the easy way out. I love Lower Decks for the exact same reason, because while it makes fun of Star Trek tropes, it's as much a love letter to Star Trek as Galaxy Quest was. The lower deckers, to a person, epitomize the ideals of Star Trek.
Hope for us all. What has Star Wars got compared to that?
Star Wars, OTOH assumes a broken, impossible, un-fixable universe. At best you can save yourselves, and your friends, but the big stuff depends on some "magical daddy". Politically that might better reflect our modern world, but it's ultimately pretty bleak.
I choose the ST universe. But can we pretend that the last two seasons of Discovery never happened? Puhlleeze?
(plus, never enough Janeway!)
The first two seasons I enjoyed as an exploration of what Star Trek or Starfleet might inspire, an exemplary officer in a desperate situation choosing mutiny as a solution to a problem. The relaxed nature of the Starfleet navy being not strictly a military function, but a civic minded scientific function. The spiral into the absurd of a civilian being court martialed out of service and given a life sentence (iirc), was a slap in the face of how Starfleet might fail.
The Fifth Season seemed quite at home in the wake of the first two seasons, and the magical McGuffin chase is in hindsight a pleasant addition. It morphs much of the series into a campy parody. The chafing of a tardigrade the size of a bear, and a failure to adhere to the "warp speed limits", etc. all fall quiet to Burnham's refusal to accept the artificial gravity and Warp Field Geometry (as Q says, change the gravitational constant) technology guarded by the Progenitor.
"xyz is better"? That's Evok chatter.
The one thing is a fantasy, the other a possbile future.
So you like the fantasy more? fine. now go play with your lightsaber.
You can go play with your phaser.
However, the Skywalker arc is a transformative one which humanizes the villain in a partial departure of the good vs evil fairy tale. It "pulls back the curtain" on the fairy tale ever so slightly.
Knights of the Old Republic II is an exciting entry into the Star Wars Lore, because the psycho analyzing pulls the curtain back farther, exposing flaws of the light side. There is a pathway to maturity in the Star Wars saga.
---
Star Trek is similar to the old Fables, in that many of the arcs are morality tales. Star Trek also tends to carry a very idealized and optimistic vision of the future, almost fairy tale like in execution.
If the argument is that Star Wars is for children, then what makes Star Trek not for children?