Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
And 5th season is the only good season out of last three. Interesting tie-in into the lore with good pacing, they actually do explore something almost every episode and many of those ♥♥♥♥♥♥ characters\actors don't pop out that much. Saru replacement was great too, nice addition. "Villains" are also decent this time. Elias Toufexis voice acting is always good.
You answered your own argument. What could have been good about Disco is what they stripped away. They had the chance for greatness, and dumbed it down to mediocre CW teen drama with great CGI. I think that's an unforgiveable sin.
I guess that's why Star Trek still inspires debate after 50 years. I will still call ST:D S5 as the very worst in franchise history. (and that is one of my hills).
The writing was insipid and not worthy of a bright 12-year old. Seriously, plot and dialog have never been worse. Not even in the first animated series. ( which OMG had cringy icky ♥♥♥♥ aplenty) .
But I respect your completely wrong opinion. Tell me what you think ST's worst season has been?
I'm not. Not because of the wokeness, itself, though, but because of the hamfisted approach they chose time and again to present it. They might've mellowed out a bit over the Seasons in regards to things that have already been crammed down our throats two or three times, but they sure as hell have to do it again every single time something new comes up. Even at the obvious detriment to the show and storytelling.
Saru would be the only one to make my personal list, to be honest. Too much unwarranted Mary Sue'ing going on with the rest of the cast, especially Burnham, for my taste.
Rayner might've gotten a chance at the list had he appeared earlier. But I doubt he'd have been given any real chance of beating some damn needed professionalism into this motley crew.
That's actually a fair description, I think. There's awesome scenery and effects work, and individual pieces of the show could work quite well if the writing and acting had been polished several times over, but the overarching whole feels cobbled together from whatever one could grab from official and non-official stories and fan fiction.
It is always good to have one thing you can compare every other show with and say:"Well it is not as bad as ST Discovery!"
FTW!
but for the thread question...you might have guessed it. nope, not on board. :)
I watched the first three seasons. I forgave a lot of the issues with the first season, but just such. The second was better but ended weakly. The third season was just overall hard to watch.
My issues are myriad, but mostly boil down to Burnham. I love Sonequa Martin-Green, but the writing for her character never made much sense. She was overly emotional and obviously the star of the show - so much that it damaged an otherwise compelling crew. that I wanted to enjoy. I still lament that so many interesting characters were outshone by the need for the writers to make Burnham the Star Trek Superhero.
It's ok though. Strange New Worlds more than makes up for my misgivings, and Lower Decks has been it's own brand of amazing. Disco is what it is, and that's ok. Everyone doesn't have to like the same thing for it to have value.
I disagree with you on only one point. Strange New Worlds was in development alongside Discovery. They took very different approaches to source material. Obviously one worked and one didn't. I agree with you especially about the "Star Trek Superhero" aspect. Best Trek has always been ordinary (but smart) people in impossible situations.
PS, the finale wasn't as bad as Enterprise's (how could it be?) But it was the second worst finale, to the absolute worst entry in the franchise.
I can’t tell if they are bad actors, since a bad script can make good actors look atrocious. Like Mark Wahlberg is an ok actor but let M. Night Shyamalan write his lines in The Happening consequently you can’t tell if he’s a terrible actor or the script is so bad and unrelatable that he can’t help himself. One thing I do think is the cast don’t seem to appreciate anything Star Trek like, and that probably shows in their acting, with a ton of arrogance and egotism.
What really sucks is how Jar Jar Abrams production company tricked some viewers into thinking these CBS All Access/Paramount+ series' were in the same continuity as the OG series, TNG etc - they are are NOT. They are part of the Spock Prime Universe and therefore, these are NOT the same characters we grew up with - the same characters that we know and love. Therefore, meh to any CBS All Access/Paramount + ST related content.
Note/Edit: I canceled my sub to CBS All Access/Paramount+ before I hate watched the final seasons of STD and Space TP. I did hear that (spoiler-free) that s3 of Space Toilet Paper was good. If I ever resub (maybe when P+ gets the full South Park license back), I'll revisit the final season of both.
Edit 2: besides STD and Space Toilet Paper, the only other TV series I've hated watched were the craptastical 'Under the Dome' (CBS) and the pos 'Rings of Power' (Amazon)