Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
"This one's got floaty things. This is really sandy. Oh! 'Shrooms!"
A planet of almost total water would certainly have life at all depths. Especially considering most of earths life is in our oceans and we are only 70% water coverage.
are you ok
Actually, when you beat the game in you get a good view of a large portion of the map, you see several islands and a rather large and mysterious area covered by what seems to be ice *cough* arctic DLC *cough*
the devs do confirm this tho. Look up the data entry for "crater edge"
I mean, that's literally what Yellowstone National Park is... Beautiful landscapes sitting directly on top of a super volcano. Subnautica is just the underwater version of this.
Having the game world be a gigantic floater island would make more sense and would fit with the whole floating rock concept if it wasn't for the lava.
EDIT: Fixed typo and word repetition.
The going under the map problem was likely a mistake on their part.