安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
I remember the WiiU being problematic because Nintendo wanted a lot more money for the devkit and the WiiU was difficult to work with in the first place.
I hope Nintendo make it easier with the Switch.
The lag and slow in-between loading actually happens on many high-end as well.
It's a problem with the game not being optimized yet which will happen in the next months.
About the water looking like squares I could only guess, and my guess is your GPU is either using very outdated drivers or you're running on something like an integrated GPU.
If you go to Help > System Information in Steam, it'll give you a list of your basic specs you can copy/paste into a post.
Manufacturer: Hewlett-Packard
Model: 20-b013w
Form Factor: Desktop
No Touch Input Detected
Processor Information:
CPU Vendor: AuthenticAMD
CPU Brand: AMD E1-1200 APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics
CPU Family: 0x14
CPU Model: 0x2
CPU Stepping: 0x0
CPU Type: 0x0
Speed: 1397 Mhz
2 logical processors
2 physical processors
HyperThreading: Unsupported
FCMOV: Supported
SSE2: Supported
SSE3: Supported
SSSE3: Supported
SSE4a: Supported
SSE41: Unsupported
SSE42: Unsupported
AES: Unsupported
AVX: Unsupported
CMPXCHG16B: Supported
LAHF/SAHF: Supported
PrefetchW: Supported
Network Information:
Network Speed:
Operating System Version:
Windows 10 (64 bit)
NTFS: Supported
Crypto Provider Codes: Supported 311 0x0 0x0 0x0
Video Card:
Driver: AMD Radeon HD 7310 Graphics
DirectX Driver Name: aticfx32.dll
Driver Version: 15.201.1151.0
DirectX Driver Version: 8.17.10.1404
Driver Date: 21 Aug 2015
OpenGL Version: 4.5
Desktop Color Depth: 32 bits per pixel
Monitor Refresh Rate: 60 Hz
DirectX Card: AMD Radeon HD 7310 Graphics
VendorID: 0x1002
DeviceID: 0x9809
Revision Not Detected
Number of Monitors: 1
Number of Logical Video Cards: 1
No SLI or Crossfire Detected
Primary Display Resolution: 1600 x 900
Desktop Resolution: 1600 x 900
Primary Display Size: 17.44" x 9.80" (20.00" diag)
44.3cm x 24.9cm (50.8cm diag)
Primary Bus Type Not Detected
Primary VRAM: 384 MB
Supported MSAA Modes: 2x 4x
Sound card:
Audio device: Speakers (Realtek High Definiti
Memory:
RAM: 3667 Mb
Miscellaneous:
UI Language: English
Microphone: Not set
Steam Controller Cable and Base: Not set
Media Type: DVD
Total Hard Disk Space Available: 474977 Mb
Largest Free Hard Disk Block: 279313 Mb
OS Install Date: Dec 31 1969
Game Controller: None detected
VR Headset: None detected
Compounding the problem though, is AMD abandoned all those older GPUs when they moved to their new GCN architecture back in 2015[wccftech.com]. So there haven't been any driver updates for them since July, 2015 and a beta Crimson driver in March, 2016 was the last driver available:
- Source[support.amd.com]
For new games, driver support is pretty important, so a GPU being moved to legacy status means it effectively has been left to rot, in an "as is" condition. It may work fine for older games of course, but it's technically not supported by AMD anymore and so it would be hard for developers to support it either.
If it's any consolation, i have an i7-4700HQ, 8GB, Intel HD 4600 laptop and the game does run but it's barely even playable. 15-25 FPS on low 1024x768. The frame rate is abysmal. It would be roughly 4x worse on yours (if you could get it to run).
I think you had the right idea. I'd refund and get this again later on when you have a nice gaming PC so you can enjoy the visuals.
As far as the Switch port... I wouldn't count on a Switch port either. The XBOne version looks and runs like crap compared to PC. Switch just isn't close to powerful enough a machine to compete with the PS4/XBO hardware updates that Subnautica is going to need to even run on those consoles. On the base XBO, the game is already straining the console just to keep FPS above 20.
Something like that is passable for medium/high and 1080p in most games today. But you'd also still need to build it, buy an OS license and install it on the SSD, buy a 1080p Monitor/TV, keyboard and mouse (or reuse your HP ones) at a minimum.
Here's that build with a budget acer 1080p/60Hz monitor and Windows 10 Home 64-bit: https://pcpartpicker.com/list/MVphNN
So around $750 if you're in the US.
To be honest, you don't really need a high-end graphics-card. A quad-core CPU (i7 or AMD Ryzen) and a medium-range GPU (like GTX 960 for example) are already pretty decent.
Even my i5 and GTX 750 can still play pretty much anything that's being thrown on the market now, just not always with maxed settings of course.
For CPU's, you might want to check the new line of AMD-CPU's, Ryzen. According to most current benchmarks they're decent and not *that* expensive - it's been a while since AMD could compete with Intel.
You need to choose a mainboard according to what CPU and what GPU you plan to use.
For RAM, make sure you have at least 8 GB.
For GPU's, if you're really into gaming and maxing out settings it can get really expensive.
I can't help you much with AMD-cards, never had any of those; I always went with NVidia.
Good cards in the GTX-lineup would be 780, 880, 980, 1080.
Decent cards are 770, 870, 960, 970.
Note that the performance of cards with the same chipset can still vary depending on the manufacturer (like Zotac).