Steam installeren
inloggen
|
taal
简体中文 (Chinees, vereenvoudigd)
繁體中文 (Chinees, traditioneel)
日本語 (Japans)
한국어 (Koreaans)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgaars)
Čeština (Tsjechisch)
Dansk (Deens)
Deutsch (Duits)
English (Engels)
Español-España (Spaans - Spanje)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spaans - Latijns-Amerika)
Ελληνικά (Grieks)
Français (Frans)
Italiano (Italiaans)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesisch)
Magyar (Hongaars)
Norsk (Noors)
Polski (Pools)
Português (Portugees - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Braziliaans-Portugees)
Română (Roemeens)
Русский (Russisch)
Suomi (Fins)
Svenska (Zweeds)
Türkçe (Turks)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamees)
Українська (Oekraïens)
Een vertaalprobleem melden
Keep exaggerating and making things up, really shows how baseless your arguments are.
What if Larian Studios made Baldurs Gate 3, so that at the end of Act 1, your character gets perma killed and forces you to play with the origin story characters through the remainder of the game, and their reason was "because that's what happens in the story"? Assuming people have played it since it was game of the year but, how would you feel about that? I imagine pretty pissed off. This is very much like that. Yeah you can finish the game, but what hell was the point? See I can make up stuff too.
and what about it anyway? if everyone had the same skill cap with different focusses there would be an actual point for going for different clan members, knowing how much points are left to a certain individual to fill a role. your arguement is absolute ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥.
If they allow the initial character to max all skills then there's no need to ever control other characters and the entire concept of the mask is moot. Sure, different masks have different abilities but the main thing all of them can do could just be removed from the game which could just be called "Masks" at that point. Plenty of other games like that.
There would be zero point and you know it.
I really hope the devs don't fully cater to ya'll. Again, I see some room for compromise like allowing a couple skills to max out but thats it.
What's next? You'll demand getting perks, and only the positive ones? Well, at least there's one that fits, "Likes Defecation".
No, giving the player the ability to max out all their points is NOT going to keep people from playing other characters and the concept of the mask is NOT moot. If you spend all your time on your main character maxing out your skills, you are playing the game wrong, Only a sadist would enjoy doing this. Imagine having to smelt ALL your own ore, all your own farming, all your own gathering, never relying on an NPC for anything.
But, when it comes to combat, hunting, a boss, or a dungeon run, it would be nice to be able to use your own character. And before you go "yeah but the main character is immortal and can't perma die", well yeah cause for one they're hiding in a house like a sissy, but also, NPCs get immortality. So why does campfire care if your most beastly warrior dies late game? Why give npcs immortality like the PC? Because the same whiny babies who are arguing against no player limits, would be throwing a hissy fit on steam the second they lost their 130 NPC warrior to lag or disconnect. So the immortality argument goes right out the window. And what spirit mask that's mind controlling people would want a gimp in their tribe, ruining morale and not contributing to anything? The game as it is now is contextually broke.
as for the character just sitting around. you can clear the inventory, respawn from the esc menu and no more useless flesh bag lying around
Tf you on about? You never have to control a different character to max their crafting skills. You assign them to bench, have them make stuff, go to their proficiency tab to increase buffs- done. Playing as them is simply not needed and again, if that happens, the mask becomes just another piece of gear.
Edit: Controlling another character and then smelting ore IS doing it yourself....
Learn to read, I never said that you had to control an NPC to max their skills. We are saying the same thing. You would have to be an idiot to max skills controlling any character, which is exactly my point of WHY uncapping the player character, is not a big deal. All these people freaking out in here about suggesting uncapping the player, because they think "ERMERGERD they just want to make uber character!!"" Well, you can also make uber character with NPCS but nobody in their right mind would do that because it would be colossal waste of time and largely inefficient.
Starting toon should either be up-gradable, maybe through sacrifice. Or be able to dismiss it, chase it away, or sacrifice it at the bonfire. You have a limited number of tribe members. You can send away any of the others.
Trolling people in a game discussion is like sitting on your front porch and yelling at kids in the street to stay off your grass. You have to seriously be a lonely, bored, useless piece of trash to have nothing better to do than go into a discussion and tell people who are obviously giving feedback that was asked for by the developers.
So Officer Chibbs and Zalzany either dont understand what you are saying, which would be pretty sad, or they are trolls, which is way more sad. They should take off their badges and roll off to something better. Maybe you can be a protester, or a bag lady.
Your request, Saint, is not only valid, but makes sense. It is a good observation, and a possible solution. You did what the devs asked. You gave input, and an idea. I can only hope Chibbs and Zalzany get the mental help they need, or a hobby, or a pet. Something to help them pass the time, and manage their anger management issues.