Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
How do they compare? I thought they were the same devs
The developer of this game was not happy with how the publisher treated him, so he left them and made MudRunners, which is a 2.0 version of this game. He can do that, because the engine and name are his property.
MudRunners is getting way more updates and has way more content. This game is nice, but MudRunners is so much better. Also, the developer there gets better treatment, ensuring that the game will get quality updates.
If you consider dumbing things down for console port and already releasing a 2.0 game as another cash-grab to be "better" and "quality", then I suppose you might be right...
Found this at the bottom of https://www.focus-home.com/en-us/games/mudrunner-american-wilds-edition