ELDEN RING NIGHTREIGN

ELDEN RING NIGHTREIGN

You're dumb to support this
It looks like a fan mod. It has almost NO new assets. Being a fan boy isn't a good thing. Don't buy every log that From squats out.
< >
Showing 61-75 of 144 comments
Ash Feb 18 @ 7:36pm 
I’m sure they can still add a battle pass if you’d like, only takes 2 to cost the same so give it time.
RoiRoiJe Feb 19 @ 3:56pm 
You're dumb for doomposting about something that you don't know ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ about.
Originally posted by RoiRoiJe:
You're dumb for doomposting about something that you don't know ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ about.
I know far more than you'll ever know, rhymes with witch.
NakoTeru Feb 19 @ 9:42pm 
Originally posted by Mecharion:
Originally posted by cat wearing a party hat:
throughout all of these complaint posts, no one has actually been able to make a solid argument as to why the asset reuse is a problem. developers have been doing this for decades, and some really good games have come out of it.
+ fromsoft is literally known for being the studio that shamelessly copy/pastes their own material. this has been the case for the entire soulsborne series.

Tell me one game that recycles stuff on this level of shameless. I doubt you will find one.

I mean i get it.. I GET IT.. you and the hollow guy REALLY want to like this game. For whatever reasons.

Its fine. Just go for it. Buy 10 coyps each and every DLC thrown on you. But dont cry if in 5 years every new game is like.. this..

mario
Ponyeater Feb 20 @ 11:53am 
Originally posted by 7multipliedby7again:
Originally posted by RoiRoiJe:
You're dumb for doomposting about something that you don't know ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ about.
I know far more than you'll ever know, rhymes with witch.
What do you want to do at the beach and why are you inviting me specifically?
Tinkuwu Feb 20 @ 3:00pm 
Originally posted by 7multipliedby7again:
No, they really didn't. Copy and pasting from Sekiro or Bloodborne isn't "adding new things."

There's a new class that channels different elemental combinations to create one powerful spell, depending on the order of elements received. Literally hundreds of combinations can be done for different spell effects. If that's not new to the series, I don't know what is.

Plus I find it funny how the game isn't even released yet people are upset about not seeing new things. It was the same thing with Elden Ring. "It's just open world Dark Souls 3 and a jump button and horse! Nothing new!", but we got shield counters, jump attacks, horse combat, frenzy flame spells, sleep effects, a whole array of new areas to explore and new bosses to beat, weapons that can have different ashes of war on them to change up the gameplay, and an entire DLC area that gave us a ton more to work with, especially with the crafting system. (Seriously, if you have not used giant pots, they are fun to use)

So, if you think that the network test is all there is to offer, you are sorely mistaken. Unless you work for Fromsoft and can tell us every little detail of what will be in the game. Otherwise you're spouting nonsense because you're upset that you cannot afford a game that, in your own eyes, is not worth $40. The people who bought the game, believes it's worth $40, and there's nothing you can do to convince them otherwise.
Originally posted by Tinkuwu:
Originally posted by 7multipliedby7again:
No, they really didn't. Copy and pasting from Sekiro or Bloodborne isn't "adding new things."

There's a new class that channels different elemental combinations to create one powerful spell, depending on the order of elements received. Literally hundreds of combinations can be done for different spell effects. If that's not new to the series, I don't know what is.
Definitely not how it will pan out. You're in hype mindset. It will be a handful of combinations at best.

Originally posted by Tinkuwu:
Plus I find it funny how the game isn't even released yet people are upset about not seeing new things. It was the same thing with Elden Ring. "It's just open world Dark Souls 3 and a jump button and horse! Nothing new!", but we got shield counters, jump attacks, horse combat, frenzy flame spells, sleep effects, a whole array of new areas to explore and new bosses to beat, weapons that can have different ashes of war on them to change up the gameplay, and an entire DLC area that gave us a ton more to work with, especially with the crafting system. (Seriously, if you have not used giant pots, they are fun to use)
-Countering was already in the previous games. Who cares if it's on shields.
-Jump attacks were already in the previous games. They're also highly impractical in many scenarios.
-Horse combat isn't that deep and super unfun. Every hit you fall of your horse. That's pure tedium. Easily the worst part of Elden Ring. There's a reason the "No Open World" mod is popular.
-Ashes of war isn't that legendary. You can finally switch out the special on your weapon. Ok. There's about 2 or 3 that are good. So you wind up using the same thing on everything anyway.

Originally posted by Tinkuwu:
So, if you think that the network test is all there is to offer, you are sorely mistaken. Unless you work for Fromsoft and can tell us every little detail of what will be in the game. Otherwise you're spouting nonsense because you're upset that you cannot afford a game that, in your own eyes, is not worth $40. The people who bought the game, believes it's worth $40, and there's nothing you can do to convince them otherwise.
No, the skeptics are probably quite on point. The game won't have much beyond what was shown. Maybe some additional 10-20% content. This isn't some rudimentary demo of the early Gaming days, where you get to see the tutorial level. The network test showed you the play area of the fortnite map. Subsequent playthroughs will be a repeat with slightly modifier rules or enemy spawns.
Last edited by Ponyeater; Feb 20 @ 3:17pm
Feast Feb 25 @ 2:10am 
bait or ♥♥♥♥♥♥, call it
pick a better battlefield for your argument. there are millions of people buying Cod 4 2025 still, and if you thought elden ring players were fan boys...
elden ring doesn't even accept fan boys, it spits them out.
Stj.Srex Feb 25 @ 8:14am 
Originally posted by JocularJosh:
Originally posted by 7multipliedby7again:
And remember, if you support this, you're maybe 1-2 games away from their games not shipping with multiplayer modes and being sold separately.
I honestly fail to see how you came to that conclusion
Common Sense?
Past Experience?
You have 40 years of gaming history showing that companies when they see new way to earn more money they will always go that way.
I just dont know how you fail to realize that.
That argument is just pure doomsaying with zero actual evidence. If we followed that logic, every FromSoft game should already be riddled with microtransactions and paid multiplayer, but that hasn't happened. In fact, FromSoft has consistently offered full, complete experiences with no cut content hidden behind paywalls.

Claiming that supporting Nightreign means the downfall of FromSoft's business model is a massive leap in logic. Nothing about this game suggests they're suddenly going to strip multiplayer from future titles and sell it separately. It’s a baseless slippery slope argument with no real connection to reality.

And if "40 years of gaming history" is your metric, then you should also acknowledge that not every company goes down that road. If FromSoft's goal was to milk players for every penny, they would have done it with Elden Ring, an already massive success with over 20 million copies sold. But they didn’t, because that’s simply not how they do things.
Stj.Srex Feb 25 @ 8:29am 
Originally posted by Hollow-Enigma:
That argument is just pure doomsaying with zero actual evidence. If we followed that logic, every FromSoft game should already be riddled with microtransactions and paid multiplayer, but that hasn't happened. In fact, FromSoft has consistently offered full, complete experiences with no cut content hidden behind paywalls.

Claiming that supporting Nightreign means the downfall of FromSoft's business model is a massive leap in logic. Nothing about this game suggests they're suddenly going to strip multiplayer from future titles and sell it separately. It’s a baseless slippery slope argument with no real connection to reality.

And if "40 years of gaming history" is your metric, then you should also acknowledge that not every company goes down that road. If FromSoft's goal was to milk players for every penny, they would have done it with Elden Ring, an already massive success with over 20 million copies sold. But they didn’t, because that’s simply not how they do things.
Not talking specifically about FS, i am talking in general.
When companies see they can cut MP from game and sell you later that part for 30-40e as DLC and get away with it, they will do that.
These kind of things always start from something that seams so irrelevant but in the end turn in to something big (Oblivion and Horse Armor)
Also, if Sony get FS who say they wont try to force them to do that.
People should know, when money is involved nothing is impossible.
Last edited by Stj.Srex; Feb 25 @ 8:32am
You're making a broad generalization with no actual connection to Nightreign itself. Just because some companies take that route doesn’t mean every studio will. If it even held up in the first place.

You're acting like this is content being cut from a main game when it was never part of one to begin with. Nightreign is its own separate experience, built around a unique structure that wouldn't just slot into a traditional Souls game the way something like CoD’s multiplayer is essential to its core design.

FromSoft has never bundled a full-fledged multiplayer-focused roguelike mode into their mainline games, so this isn't them removing anything, it’s them creating something new. Comparing it to situations where studios strip out core features just to resell them later doesn’t hold up.

And speculating about what could happen if Sony acquires them is just that, speculation. And fear-mongering over a possibility doesn’t make for a solid argument.
Originally posted by Stj.Srex:
Originally posted by JocularJosh:
I honestly fail to see how you came to that conclusion
Common Sense?
Past Experience?
You have 40 years of gaming history showing that companies when they see new way to earn more money they will always go that way.
I just dont know how you fail to realize that.
This is FromSoft and they have been very upfront about what this game is supposed to be. A side project. No MTX. No season pass. Not even full triple A price which other companies would have tried to pull.

So yeah. I still dont see it.
Priscora Feb 25 @ 9:40am 
Look at his other posts ins community... he is just a ragebaiter and is happy about getting reactions. like a neet on 4chan
< >
Showing 61-75 of 144 comments
Per page: 1530 50