Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Not that Im complaining , but it really is a surprise that Im quite curious for the sudden change.
I believe I can explain. You see.. there are people who use mods. And updates/patches break mods. The people who use mods go into a frenzied rage when this happens. Devs feel some sympathy for those people, so they dont do updates as often now to lessen outrage. But now other people are raging that there are not enough updates.
Hope that clears it up.
Since they're charging for the DLC, it makes sense that it should be loaded with stuff to better justify paying for it.
They adding new features as a desperate marketing strategical move to bring back some of the old players that left the game and with luck have them bait into purchasing the new DLC.
Not every game needs to rely in such scummy tactics. While we could argue its happening more often, we still have some solid games that did sell fully developed and polished and sold DLCs not to bring back their player-base
If another game company studio does it, it's not a scummy tactic/desperate marketing strategy? These companies are just releasing paid DLC for the heck of it, not because they want to bring back their player-base and sell more copies?
If you don't like Taleworlds, ok, cool.
Just because you can read does not mean you understand. And looks to me you either not understanding or you just putting words on people whose criticism you don´t like nor accept.
Do I have this correct?
What is an example a company that has released a paid DLC with new content/features that is NOT a desperate marketing strategy, or scummy tactics?
No gammer will ever have a positive opinion on any game (regardless of dev team, Publisher, etc) that sells an unfinished game (just one example of many issues that a game could face) and fails to its community.
If you a gamer you should know what games are out there that didn´t need to use scummy tactics to bring back their player base. Not going to feed your game. But I get it, you defending a game you like. You are just trying tooooo hard.
All I said was that your reasoning can be applied to any paid-DLC content. For all you know, I agree with your reasoning. :)
At every single point. You defend the game on a passive aggressive manner in every single one of your posts and replies. But I feel you man, I really do. Again: you trying too hard