Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
But my humble opinion, what would be the point of dismounting the cavalry in the game?
I don't see any advantage, unless you're doing a roleplay, or something like that, but it's your game, play how you want
its simply to only use Imperial Elite Cataphracts and just use them as infantry in shield wall because that unit is actually the "most tanki" unit in the game (for example he has more then 70 body armor, most other, even T6, only have something between 50-60)
ill also max out medicine for that HP boost and get leadership as high as possible for big party
is this the strongest way to play? doubt it cause the T6 from the khuzait still exist lmao
is this efficent? heck nah, making a T6 cav costs a ton of money and then just to let them not even use their horses? lmao
however it is a big blob of units that can tank more then any other blob of units and im here for it
But the buttom line was that TW has not been consistent in how they code whether something is counted as e.g. infantry. In some cases it might be only the infantry class that it applies to. Whereas, in other cases it may apply to anyone on foot that carries a melee weapon.