Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I said two handed axe, that is a swinging polearm.
But in terms of game logic, yes two-handed weapons are strong as can be on horse back, granted a pole-arm you can couch with on horse back is the strongest plunk you'll ever experience and the greatest joy when you poke someone for 500dmg.
and in this game you have limited skill-points. lern only one meele fighting skill let you take other important skills.
(1h makes no dmg and spear is only usefull on horseback)
That said, riding around whacking dudes with a great axe/sword makes you feel like THE Gigachad. the way damage scales with swinging weapons with their length (I think because it calculates there naturally being more speed) is crazy. Glaives might as well be lightsabers.
Fair enough, in game terms, but in real life a 2 handed axe is a polearm.
That being said, of course some dude used swords or axes or something like you described. But in my opinion minding momentum may be the first thing in mounted combat, so soldiers will not want to use a heavy-on-end weapon to throw them out of balance.
Basically what @BenShinobi tells.
It just looks wrong to me, I just wanted to see what others thought. It may turn out they were used in certain cultures.