Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Thus, you've run afoul one of the main problems with ChatGPT and similar "AI" textbots... They are frequently wrong, sometimes "not even wrong"...
Funny, though. With the plethora of pop-culture articles being generated, many by actual humans, someone might like your funny testimonial. :) I'm sure they have a slew of them, though.
It's likely because ChatGPT isn't actually "analyzing" the data. It's an extremely good chat-bot, not diagnostics software.
"Process_ID starts with a "2." Therefore, it must be today. Good enough -> Print "Today.""
i think you are misinformed or misunderstanding what chatgpt is good for. it is very much a brainy book that has a very narrow focus, based on what you ask it.
an example is that when prompted to write a simple piece of react code (javascript), it will often answer with the older way of writing it, but when prompted to correct it in the newer way or asked to write it with another method, it will be corrected.
it is very much a tool that should be meant as an aid and not a clutch, and it does work well in learning/reading code.
I find this more dependent on the human error of usage. Unless related to time and place. meaning some ChatGPT set-ups are not using current date or time. As far as data or technical analysis, properly used renders great results.