Removing Aging and Breeding

[Samantha Raven]

I feel this system pointless for this game it dosn't give this game any content but justs stresses the player in being timed and see there character die.

For those that dont want to get married or have kids it also will ruin the game for them.
Another issue i read people claim is the childbirth and randomness is crazy where some players having like 10 to 20 kids.

I feel the childbirth system and the aging system do the game more harm then offering any thing to the game and it just be better if there was no aging or child birth in the game time progressed with the main story maybe and events.

Anyways what does every one else think?
()()
(^,^)
()(")(") Thanks for taking time and reading my post. <3

[PeaceMaker]

Just don`t marry. Simple.

[COMRADG]

im sure in a year they will fix alot of the stuff thats OP unbalanced an just annoying in the game, i think its a kool idea that once u die u be ur kid, would be nice if u got to pick which kid u wanted to be:p

[Straybow]

I'm happy to have it toggleable so people don't lose "their character" but the family thing is one of the systems that I am most interested in. Broodmothers might need to be toned down just a tad :)

[Kirara]

I don't mind marriage being in game. It could be fun part of political game and such. But aging and breeding absolutely needs to be optional.

[morph113]

The dynasty system was the best change that I was looking for. I just hope they will make it so you age quicker and that if you don't have an heir it's game over. Right now it takes forever to age, rendering the whole thing mostly meaningless because you will grow tired of the savegame before you die of old age, so I hope they speed it up.

Also they don't need to remove it outright, why not just add it as an option so you can turn aging on or off depending on your preference. This way everyone wins.

[Kirara]

Originally posted by morph113:

The dynasty system was the best change that I was looking for. I just hope they will make it so you age quicker and that if you don't have an heir it's game over. Right now it takes forever to age, rendering the whole thing mostly meaningless because you will grow tired of the savegame before you die of old age, so I hope they speed it up.

Also they don't need to remove it outright, why not just add it as an option so you can turn aging on or off depending on your preference. This way everyone wins.

This is what I would want. Just option to turn off aging and childbirth for player character and maybe other npc's, so world would somehow function similar to warband, where everyone was fixed age.

[Glorwyn]

their*

[Samantha Raven]

Originally posted by Kirara:

I don't mind marriage being in game. It could be fun part of political game and such. But aging and breeding absolutely needs to be optional.

Ya thats a better idea to make it optional also be nice if they added a quest maybe like the fountin of youth or some kinda side quest you can take to reduce your character age going to the fountin or some thing be nice.

[kesat]

Personally while the idea is nice - i don't see the point about having a dynasty in this game to be honest.

Why would you play a save for multiple generations - there is only so much to do, and right now i can't see how you would not be able to achieve your goals within a decade.

I just don't see how it would work on the game's scale. E.g. in a Crusader Kings it's working without any problem, because it's scale is about multiple hundreds of years. But Mount and Blade?...

[GhostBlackMor]

Man the age is very slow I am on day 722 and I still on my 38 years old.

[PeaceMaker]

I personally really like marriage. I tend to roleplay it so after a long day campaigning of killing and slaughter it`s nice to come home to a peaceful pretty wife and play a game of weird MuTorere.

I really hope Devs will expand on this so you have more conversations and even see your kids running about.