安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Well in my game some armies run around with 1000 forces.... that is nothing you can beat solo.
Well, there are no "victory conditions" that we are given, so this is really an opinion. Based on previous games from TaleWorlds (Mount & Blade, Mount & Blade: Warband, Viking Conquest), the objective is to kill your enemies, take their castles and rule the map.
That's hard and it takes a very long time to accomplish, so the vast majority of players have never done it. From my perspective, it's why I'm there.
In game terms, you have Calradia, a region that is perpetually at war. Pointless struggles that put stress on the people and the land. The player can be a force that brings in an era of prosperity and peace, but first they have to kill all of the "bad guys" (or convince them to play along?).
One could simply enjoy the pointy-stabby aspects of the game and never get beyond that. I suspect that is the appeal of multiplayer? All of those other games I mentioned had no "story" so I came up with my own.
Owning the map also happens to be a victory condition that is recognized by other players. Those tend to be the players I enjoy talking to about the game, and how to play it better.
As for your own struggles, if you want, you can improve. Start small with things you can handle and work your way up to bigger challenges. No one walks in and rules the map (especially those who tell you otherwise). It takes practice, like everything else. Or, you could just run around naked and hit things with a big sword...that's fine too.
I think you might have me confused with another player? I'm not the guy who takes castles by himself.
I mentioned how the player can win against significant odds for a reason. Many players don't ever realize that the game is actually very forgiving...it's a hero fantasy after all. For this game, much of my experience with older titles may not be that relevant? I don't have a core group of elite soldiers to dominate the map with, but I have a good army and a faction that I can call upon.
Not knowing what you mean by "solo", it's hard to comment but if you mean the player character with no army, and no companions, etc....well "duh?", of course that won't get you very far. There are others who will learn to do it just to make a point, however...that's not me.
I have an army, I have companions, and I'm not afraid to call up my pals by spending influence points. As such, I defeated two massive armies of 1,000+ enemy soldiers yesterday. Both times, I was jumped by the faction I was besieging. My army had just over 400 guys in total. That's not terribly impressive by Warband standards.
I tried to fight a force that was eight times greater last night - that didn't work out so well. That was too much for me to handle. My point is to encourage others to find their sweet spot, not cower from looters and cry about bandits.
Now that I'm thinking of it, taking castles solo is probably a lot easier in this game than any of the older titles? With siege machines, weak garrisons, and player near-invulnerability...such feats never seemed so tantalizing before?
600v600 battle and the Vlandians had almost 200 heavy cav. That is just too much at the very beginning.
This is also true to a lesser extent when attacking a Hideout, though even without their horses, Heavy Cav units will probably still outperform any kind of bandit thanks to their heavy armor.
Though Vlandia also has one other advantage: their background trait for simply being Vlandian makes their troops gain XP 20% more quickly, so they will have access to higher tier troops much sooner than the other factions as a result. Plus, just in general, many of their troops gain access to heavy armor pretty early on, even their infantry and crossbowmen.
My game is became pretty balanced. I am at day 820. Vlandia is still the strongest faction but only by 1000 forces. The kings army just lost a battle. He and a ton ob nobles got captured. Vlandia, Battania and Khuzait are the only faction left.
War of three kingdoms. I have a city with 2 castles attached and ~500 >t3 forces, 500k on the bank and still wondering if I shall betray them and leave.
I would love to conquer the world but I am dead sure in this state of game you can rule the world of how the AI basically runs around with 1000 forces armies.
I joined Vlandia and we almost got spanked by Western Empire early-mid game. We are at peace and ive just got my banner up, so we shall see....but overall Empire and kicking everyone about.
Well farming influence is the one thing. I got tons of influence, got the king and most of the nobles on relation 100 and still i can´t do anything. Propose to get a new city? Nope. New Castle? Nope. New laws? Nope. Despite being the only one destroying tons of enemy armies and no one cares.