安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Yeah. I win most of my battles because of archers and crossbowmen in larger quantities.
Sure you can go heavy anything and succeed.... Infact is I had 50 Legionary's only I would happily put them in a Shield wall and advance thru your barrage of arrows and come out on the other side with all your archers dead....
You could go all Heavy Cavalry and have the same success as all archers....
That's a very generalized way of putting it.
Everything Sturgia has is weak, except for Veteran Warriors. They are okay.
Their Veteran Archers are usable, but they are a joke compared to Battanian archers.
Sturgian units aren't even worth discussing.
They are the conversation you'd have after an awkward moment.
If all your other troops die perhaps your composition isn't that good. Investing in some medical-skill is also a good idea. It's always better to play dead than be dead in the field :D
Well if cost effectiveness is key then my army of 100 Peasants would be right up your alley!
^^^^ I actually did this never laughed so hard as i watched things get literally stoned to death before them!