Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
Sad thing is the dog at the beginning I had more emotion for than any of the characters, except maybe luke. But I still like the dog best.
GG telltale, killed best character in first 10 mins.
Compare that with those species where there is no such dependence. Most herd creatures have young which are up and running within hours.
In many respects, the need to protect our young is a driving force for conquering our environs,, as opposed to the nomadic or herd like existance other species and indeed many of the survivors in the Walking Dead lead.
If the species is the survive, then at some point the survivors are going to have to stop being scavengers and start adapting to the new reality and start being builders, farmers, conquerors and also start having babies,.. otherwise within a decade or so there will be no more survivors.
Maybe a bit deep, but I suppose the storyline is going to have to go that way at some point.
If it plays out to be impossible to survive with offspring, then there's no hope for the survival of anyone. The risk that comes with a baby in this scenario, is one that I think has to be taken.
You would see a semi fuedal society, where "strongholds" exist, probably no ammo left at that point, so fighting the undead would resemble a mismash of modern public order and medieval tactics with the use of stake and fire pits, funneling and shield walls, spears, trench spikes etc.
There would be tyrants and religious nutters running some of these strongholds, but also survivalists and genuine excellent leaders. The worst kind of criminals criminals would likely diminish due to infighting and their own self destructive tendencies in time. That means that some kind of stability would have to be out there for having children and "communities".
However, caring for a baby "on the run" in zombie territory would end very quickly in tragedy. Realistically this is something you should have had a good 8-9 months to plan and consider.
how did we get to where we are today without looking after them with our lives?
Where would we be now if we had this mind set to kill them cause we were prey.
Cuz before we didn't have to worry about us being detected by sound of a baby's crying who deosen't know any better. We was never prey and we lived safly knowing that death isn't a day to day life. Before we knew that even if we died the child might still have made it. The child is pretty much dead anyway it will slow you down and lower your chances for survival more than it already are considering day to day survival is already hard. And when you die the baby will die with you. It will cry so laud a walker will hear it and eat it. You don't see hords chasing you wherever you go do you?
Walkers only find, chase and eat very likly in groups and they outnumber the living by far. You don't have to worry about something like that in real life