Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
2. if a special pistol like the welrod can make a 9mm much quieter than usual, its not really unrealistic for a game to feature one that somehow managed to be slightly quieter
The ruger is already extremely, tremendously good with how fast you can dish out shots in total silence, it does not need to be buffed. And theres absolutely no universe in which the VP9 needs a nerf
But you're talking about realism, not balance.
I'm not sure where you're getting these numbers from, but they're wrong. VP9 has a suppressor with wipes in it. When using subsonic 9mm, it will always be quieter than a traditional non-wipe suppressor.
I'm a bit skeptical on the 130dB figure, even if it's from B+T. SPL measurements are notoriously unreliable for a host of reasons. Environmental factors, placement and setup, and even measurement settings (C-weighted vs A-weighted, fast/slow response) can all affect the number.
Without knowing more about their setup, that number doesn't say much. There are plenty of videos on youtube showing the VP9 (now known as the Station Six), and it's quiet enough to shoot without any hearing protection. The impact of the bullet on the target is louder than the gunshot. 130dB is about the same volume as a jackhammer.
if the vp9 was arbitrarily made louder than the ruger, then why would you ever pick the vp9?
thinking a game should be changed because of realism, based off of stats you see on the internet, of a gun you never listened to in real life, without considering how awful the change would be in terms of balance. its just so crazy
And there already isn’t a reason to pick VP9. Suppressed-no-booster 45 performs just as well for most cases, and the throwing knife is just as quiet and just as deadly.
Also it will make little/no difference in damage on True Difficulty most of the time, as the VP9 will still have a consistent two-shot against alerted enemies
meanwhile the knife, while super good, also only has a capacity of 1 and needs to be picked up all the time, and cant multikill, and you can have both at once, and..
If anything, the only element in the game that could possibly invalidate the VP9 is the ruger, and yet you are asking the ruger to be quieter despite it having way bigger firepower
if you want to get into the hyper details theres unrealism all around. Youre literally a single guy that can kill 40+ people relatively effortlessly and beat them to death. One of the protagonists can inhale some random drug that makes time get slowed down from his perspective. Its almost like the game was made with the intent to be fun and have some cool stuff that makes sense and matches reality instead of being an actual hyper-realistic experience
If you’re going for a hybrid approach, knife +
EMP gun + suppressed no booster is way more useful in every scenario.
you seriously need to explain how suppressed no booster invalidates the vp9. you are getting far more noise (40% more radius, able to alert off-screen enemies) and still usually only two-shotting the enemies.
among my friends the consensus is that no-boost suppressors felt really outclassed unless its on the desert eagle, as theyre basically turning the gun into a louder VP9