Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
But as far as I know there's no ban on card counting. Where did this all come from?
You will not get banned for counting. As you can see, one of the developers even suggested it.
If you have sucess, let us know, I'm curious to see how effective it really is.
But my success with balanced counts has been rather mixed - especially since I decided to use the Mentor count because I like the fact that it trues at two decks instead of one - because you're never going to get to one deck left in a shoe game - and it makes the playing indexes much more accurate, since it's so inflated. And I do drop the count a lot - recently when raising my bets, low cards continue to fly out in a way that would be extremely unlikely if my count was accurate. Plus it pivots weirdly; +5 (or possibly 6?) is even money according to the author (given Four Kings rules), but it recommends you start ramping up your betting at +7, which is at most a quarter of a percent advantage. And you will get true counts in the 30s, using Mentor. I may switch back to the Halves - the entire point of which is to get 3-level accuracy with 1-level indices and 1-level pivots, so +1 is even money and every point after that is half a percent. Gives you a much better sense of where you're at.
I'm being detailed because someone said they were interested. Yeah, I'm fascinated with it the same way - in a casino I play poker, and my original reason for playing here - to play poker with no stakes - is moot, being a charter member of "The Blinds are Insane" club, so I play blackjack, and have fun with the numbers.
(Seriously though, the blinds? wtf).
What do you think typical penetration is? I can usually get one or two decks in max before someone joins or leaves, and it reshuffles. It seems like any count would be almost useless under those circumstances.
I'm curious as to why it reshuffles so often. To discourage counting?
I learned the hard way about the false reshuffles about the third time I restarted my count when a new player entered, only to see the cut card fly out 3 hands later, after dozens of hit 12s and 16s and 15s that should have been surrendered.
When everyone stands - that's an actual reshuffle, but it will never reshuffle until it hits the cut card no matter how many people show up and leave, as long as there is someone still sitting at the table.
*Edit* I should say it's 4 1/2 decks. 1 1/2 decks is the number of cards the are cut off.