安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
举报此帖
They recently extended to December 2022 but come January 1 2023, all bets are off.
lol no
What do you mean by writing even? Prose? BG2 wins. Quality of the story, defined as a plot, worldbuilding, companion characters? BG2 wins.
Anything related to text and vocals from acting or narrator, and I suppose acting and cinematic are part of it but BG2 in that is very weak. So story, stories, dialogs, eventually notes and books.
If you can't see how The Witcher 1 (less for 2 or 3) and Dragonfall are league above BG2 I wonder how many novels you read in your life.
hundreds, and even wrote a dozen or so
Baldur's gate's prose, wordy and flowery as it may be, is some of the best prose you can find in a video game. The young adult novel style of dragonfall doesn't even compare. As for witcher, that's not a text heavy game, so when discussing prose, we'd have to go with dialogs.
Witcher's dialogs are juvenile and vulgar, with lotsa kurwa and little substance.
Vocals are whole different subject anyway, and shouldn't be discussed under "writing".
The Witcher 1 or Dragonfall would be much better novels or short novels, but you seem unable to see it, or have a different opinion, ok.
EDIT:
For vocals, ok but their text then, writing matter for movies.
The witcher ripped of multiple fantasy books. And I don't mean was inspired, it literally ripped it off, and Sapkowski was accused of plagiarism.
Although Witcher 1 is mostly an original story, it rides heavily on the books, constantly introducing quests, events and characters that were straight out ripped from the books with minor alterations. The Strzyga hunt is one prominent example. So yeah, you can argue that Witcher was already made into a book, and it's not a bestselling masterpiece(used to be in poland 30 years ago, due to not having any competition at the time).
Baldur's Gate 2 is by no means generic. Although taking place in DnD Forgotten Realms, which are like a foundation of all western style fantasy since 1980's, it manages to stay fresh and original.
Perhaps it's been a while since you played it, and you're confusing it with first Baldur's Gate game which was, I agree, quite boring and generic story, location, dialog and companion character wise?
Dragonfall has writing of young adult book not just in style, but also in content. I especially laughed at the quest of that girl with cybernetic arms, whatever her name was, when she was telling her oh so tragic backstory where she was taken in...by acolytes of Horned God...but they were actually (shhhh!) Satanists! And Horned God....is the devil!!!111!! Haha, can't make this ♥♥♥♥ up even if I tried.
It is equal in length to the first 4 books by Martin (songs of fire and Ice etc). If Dorok has not found this, the joke is on him.
Attack this question from a fact driven evidence based spot, and the winnner is clear. BG2.
One's personal preference in books of course affects one personal pereference in Games and stroy driven games.
Maybe play BG2 again and do something different ? and a new fresh book will emerge.
You can even find documentary movies about the work put into BG2. Many of the old develpers that are still around call it the "biggest crunsh ever", crunch beeing the amount of time it took to put everything in.
Tbh, I'd reject this argument. Quantity is not quality. This is why I couldn't stand pillars of eternity writing, a lot of text was just filler that didn't contribute to the story, character development or even world building.
Bg2 writing is both quantity and quality tho. But the point is, that sheer amount of text doesn't guarantee good writing.