Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
It would be great if Coop mode were offered as an option. Having both single-player and Coop, would be a much stronger selling point than just single-player alone.
You then eventually find a wife and eventually have a child hence the dynasty.
Let us see what part of this lends itself to co-op or any form of multiplayer? Thats right nothing discussion over proven that co-op will not work.
I mean look at the SP games that bowed to the Co-op crowd all of them have sucked including the stupid MP setting for MD was a complete failure that map is too large for a single player and the game becomes the easiest you win game ever made in the history of gaming if you have even 1 other player with you.
Greenhell the same a already rather easy survival game whose only real challenge was the solitude adding multiplayer made it so that even the only challenge it had gets destroyed
-
little wrong here. Medieval Dynasty is co op and you can get pregnant with the co op player and have kids and make the dynasty go on.
but i see your point :) Farmer dynasty for me is relaxing game. if i want to co op i play Farming simulator.