Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
You can mix anything but never mix industry with housing.
Just remember commercial high density makes a ton of noise.
High density will create a lot more traffic because there in more crammed into a small area.
I've tried to zone in 4x4 cells without allowing any building to span boundaries so that its neighbors can't fully expand. Nevertheless, a 4x4 high-density zone on a corner will often be taken up by two or three smaller buildings rather than one full-sized one. Is there any reason to avoid this (by using only low-density zones on corners)? Perhaps the entire issue is not worth worrying about. It does make zoning more time-consuming.
put a pedestrian path in there if you want the look of an extended sidewalk, or some trees and bushes for decoration.
I can usually do this by simply not letting the lot be on a corner until it is occupied. Zone the space against the one street, then add the cross street when the building goes up.
As for offices, since discovering the value of the Industry 4.0 policy, it now seems best not to build any offices until all industries have transitioned to it and you have all the industry you want. Then start building offices to use remaining educated citizens.