ติดตั้ง Steam
เข้าสู่ระบบ
|
ภาษา
简体中文 (จีนตัวย่อ)
繁體中文 (จีนตัวเต็ม)
日本語 (ญี่ปุ่น)
한국어 (เกาหลี)
български (บัลแกเรีย)
Čeština (เช็ก)
Dansk (เดนมาร์ก)
Deutsch (เยอรมัน)
English (อังกฤษ)
Español - España (สเปน)
Español - Latinoamérica (สเปน - ลาตินอเมริกา)
Ελληνικά (กรีก)
Français (ฝรั่งเศส)
Italiano (อิตาลี)
Bahasa Indonesia (อินโดนีเซีย)
Magyar (ฮังการี)
Nederlands (ดัตช์)
Norsk (นอร์เวย์)
Polski (โปแลนด์)
Português (โปรตุเกส - โปรตุเกส)
Português - Brasil (โปรตุเกส - บราซิล)
Română (โรมาเนีย)
Русский (รัสเซีย)
Suomi (ฟินแลนด์)
Svenska (สวีเดน)
Türkçe (ตุรกี)
Tiếng Việt (เวียดนาม)
Українська (ยูเครน)
รายงานปัญหาเกี่ยวกับการแปลภาษา
4GB RAM: Base game
8GB RAM: Base game + 100 assets, 1-2 DLC's
16GB RAM: Base game + 500 assets, 5-10 DLC's
32GB RAM: Base game + 2000 assets, 15 DLC's
64GB RAM: Base game + 4000 assets, All DLC's
Still trying to get more RAM but my game with about 110mods and 5700 assets loads in 2min and 30 seconds.
Your fan needs to be great as it gets hot but I am loving it. Couldn't find an AMD for that price.
Since both Cities Skylines nor Transport Fever 2, a game that is even more CPU-constrained than CS due to its lack of hard limits, only use a few cores to run the bulk of the simulation, the single most important deciding factor is higher speed, on which the 12700K/F is noticeably better.
32 GB RAM should be enough for "thousands" of mods, especially with a page file based on a SSD set aside, though if you can upgrade the RAM that would be for the best.
I'd get this board to go with it and buy a 32GB stick of ram as opposed to 2x16GB so you don't have to upgrade all your ram when you're ready to.
ASUS ROG Z690-E
https://rog.asus.com/motherboards/rog-strix/rog-strix-z690-e-gaming-wifi-model/
They are both overkill for this game. Either one will be fine. You could even get a lower spec like 5600x or 12600k and maybe get 64GB now.
The RTX 3060 is fine and very capable for this game and the ones you listed.
But if you have any lag it will be either the game itself tapping out or page file usage slowing the game down. But the hardware itself should simulate the game just fine.
Lastly, what are your current rigs specs? Most likely you won't won't see much difference on an upgrade.
Also, what were your reasons for upgrading?
I chose the Intel as it's what I always planned to get following numerous reviews watched and read online while waiting for availability. If I just played games I'd have likely gone for the AMD, but I wanted maximum processing capability and this game is not the only thing I do. I've been saving my pennies over the past 18 months or so for this moment so wasn't going to delay. I had intended to get the i7 but it was not available.
No doubt this is overkill for this game but this is me done now for the next 3 or 4 years.
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16
• Intel Core i9-12900H
• 32GB (16GBx2) DDR5 4800MHz
• 2x 1TB PCIe/NVMe M.2 2280
• 15.6" WQXGA IPS Anti-Glare 165Hz
• NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 8 GB GDDR6
• Windows 11 Home
A 31.5' spec matching monitor was also ordered and will arrive in a few days.
My new laptop replaces this ..
ASUS ROG GL703GM
• Intel i7 8750H
• 16GB DDR4
• HDD 1TB 5400 RPM + 1TB SSD M.2
• 17.3" FHD 120Hz
• NVIDIA GeForce RTX 1060 6GB GDDR5
• Windows 10
Can't wait to see and feel the difference with Cities. I only use around 800 assets so I may give myself some more leeway now and extend that to 1,000. LSM reported 16.2GB (in red) so it was entering virtual disk territory.
I am so excited, but exhausted. I'll probably find out tomorrow. Backed up all my game files already for the change-over.