Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Depending on your setups, it might work to have a second terminal then use one-way track to force one to be 'incoming' only and the other being 'outgoing' only?
It's possible (and I think a good idea) to ship most of your freight by rail where possible, another tip I've seen is to have your internal freight network completely disconnected from your "international" freight.
Experiment with one way track / separated cargo networks and see how you go!
EDIT: Worked perfectly! Thanks, Icy.
If you see the image the main line on top will allow trains to keep going while the queue line underneath will allow your trains to wait for the main line to clear so your cargo can export or import and you can use 2 lane tracks. You don't have to create a maze of tracks for your cargo station just have a long enough queue line for your trains to join the main line and will not cause trains to despawn because the main line is waiting for the cargo train to be loaded or unloaded.
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2523810567
@Chimeran
You're not wrong! Having a fully separated cargo network could be said as the ultimate version of that; but even then they only act as a buffer and if you've an intense amount of rail traffic it's not going to drain everything in time.