Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Experienced players already know this, so I doubt they'd make such a thing.
Commercial traffic would become a nightmare. Noise pollution would cause many more sicknesses. I'll stick with my mixed use districts where I maintain control of zoning.
Won't the policy Highrise Ban satisfy your want for medium density?
The district is bordered by the 4 lane road at the bottom of the picture, the 4 lane road to the left of the agriculture zone, the 4 lane road above the offices, and the river.
Specializations are agriculture, self sufficient housing, and organic and local produce.
Just below the district name is the commercial area with schools, services, and offices separating it from the residences. If it was generic commercial, that buffer created will keep houses away from noise pollution. The 4 lane roads around the farms keep most of the houses away from noise pollution as well.
Everything is walking distance so the central metro stop easily handles transportation to the main commercial area and generic industry.
I hear an echo. lol
To echo my thoughts. I don't see it happening. This is a game, and it would screw up the simulation badly. However, Green Cities does offer some multi-use buildings. IT Office that produce Goods (same as Generic Industry), but teleports them everywhere as they are more of an online thing. It throws the import/export mechanic for a loop. But it does help a little.
I think you meant to say commerce at street level and residential above on the upper floors. I guess it is still commerce as they're apartments rentals, which would still be classified as commerce. At least that's how it works on oir local commerce avenue from building of the 20s and 30s.
But Green Cities DLC will be the closest thing you get.
I understand a mixed district is not a mixed use building, nor does it enable mixed use buildings. If you know of some in the workshop, link them for the OP. If the workshop doesn't have any, it problably isn't possible.
Deja Vu lol
Mixed use is a variety of different layouts. There is no strict format. i.e. a mixed format.
Here's what wiki says:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mixed-use_development
And being a jerk over an obviously technical malfunction won't get you anything.
that is LITERALLY what mixed use is. Which is why I said mixed use.
...yes, which is why I gave several examples.
Example of mixed use zoning from real life, Nashville, TN:
Each of these zones can be simulated with districts, game zones, and discipline.
You continued to ask the very same question, despite the original question being answered. You even provided your own answer for mixed use building, ploppables.
General Discussions isn't getting you the answer you need. For mods, try Wishlist or Workshop Discussions, or the Paradox Forums directly. For an embedded change to the game, the Paradox Forums.
Thank you for making this experience so very unpleasant.
Personal attacks? Just plain classy.
You're the one who's been insulting:
What I was looking for was crystal clear, and I added even more detail when it became apparent that you didn't understand. Rather than, y'know, gracefully accept that your answer was orthogonal to my question, you decided to become insulting over an obvious technical malfunction; steam said there was an error posting, try again, so I did.
That did not, in fact, happen. I asked one question. I then clarified further.
Plus, I somehow doubt that you are the arbiter of all things C:S, and maybe just maybe, there might be someone who knows something you don't.
Instead, you had to be haughty and insulting. Pointing out that you did so is not even remotely the same thing as a personal attack, because it is something that you straight-up did.
Thanks, again, for poisoning the discourse here. I shan't be looking for help here again, well done, I'm sure you're proud of yourself today.