Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I partially agree. I ranted to a friend when Abby's part started as I believed it was very on the nose: It was already obvious while playing Ellie that Ellie was murdering good people. There was a beautiful "show don't tell" fashion about it. Somehow, Naughty Dog thought they had to "tell" it too. I found it terribly redundant and it only got interesting with the introduction of Lev.
Two cheeks of the same arse.
Simpe: Ellie should've seen it for what it was --> equilibrium. I was unpleasantly surprised when we learned that Ellie KNEW about what Joel had done at the Firefly hospital and STILL decided to react to the act of rightful revenge with revenge. Her actions would've been better relatable if she HAD NOT known about Joel's horrific action.
Put simply, if my dad murdered one entire group of people including innocents and suffered the consequences for it... I'd accept it. I would be effing angry, but I wouldn't go out of my way to continue the cycle of violence. Karma and all that. It's because of this that I believe Ellie is definitely the villain.
Both Ellie and Abby are victims of Joel and had to learn to move past him.
While I don't disagree, Abby moved past it the moment she had her revenge -- carefully making sure she only hurt the monster with no collatoral damage. Ellie on the other hand, projected her trauma onto others. She may have moved past it at some point, but it took her the murder of multiple innocents.
There's a nuance there that, to me, makes Ellie the obvious unhinged villain and Abby the most relatable person. Again, just to hammer this home: her dad (and only person who could cure the world) was murdered while unarmed... by a scalpel to the throat...
And all the characters are in the same boat lashing out in pain, Ellie goes on a rampage just like Joel did because the game is trying to tell you how much they meant to each other especially with that reoccurring motif “If I ever were to lose you, I’d surely lose myself.”
well done sir
Imagine this as a thought experiment:
If The Last of Us Part I had centered around Abby, her father, and their friends, and the climax involved a complete stranger brutally murdering her unarmed dad with a scalpel to the throat... most players would view Abby’s desire for justice as deeply human. And just.
The problem is, the same audience then struggles to apply that same moral clarity when Joel is the one holding the scalpel. Why? Because he's “our” Joel. And that’s exactly the point:
Too many of these debates get derailed by emotional loyalty rather than objective analysis.
So let’s break it down into actual narrative facts:
1.) Joel murdered an unarmed doctor who posed no threat.
2.) Abby's motivation was simple: justice for her father.
3.) Abby and her group planned a targeted hit. They killed Joel, and spared everyone else.
4.) Ellie, fully aware of Joel’s past (like, wtf, that twist was sick and dehumanized Ellie for me), chose to pursue Abby in vengeance.
5.) In doing so, Ellie left a trail of bodies... many of whom were innocent or uninvolved.
6.) When Ellie was at Abby’s mercy, Abby let her live despite all the havoc she had wreaked.
7.) Ellie later reignited the conflict -- again! -- despite Abby’s act of mercy and the destruction already left in her wake she was fully aware of and regretful about (cough pregnant woman cough).
These are not subjective takes. These are plot events. And when you lay them out without the emotional filter of character bias, the narrative argument becomes clearer:
Abby showed restraint. Ellie didn't.
Abby ended the cycle. Ellie perpetuated it.
Abby grew. Ellie regressed.
You don't have to like Abby. But you should be able to acknowledge the arc. And in any serious moral analysis of the story, it’s hard to argue that Abby isn’t the more balanced, emotionally mature character by the end.
They have quite the development. Simplified said, Ellie lost something while Abby found something. From positive to negative and reverse. There's this saying, "Karma is a b_tch" and in that context, it figures for me.
It's an interesting story, more interesting as its prequel. The depth is impressive.
But to answer your question: even with the catastrophic event being her introduction, I would prefer Abby. Because what counts for me is the future, not the past.