Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Now, the game is being enhanced yet again for players on PC. Yet people complain about this? A studio that supports new consoles and other platforms to make the game and experience better for players. What gamer would want that.
This argument/thread is beyond absurd. But I guess the summary on your profile is 100% correct about you.
PS5 plays PS4 games, next fallacy please.
I mean yea, with backwards compatibility you can easily play the regular version on PS5. But if you want to play the remaster and experience the game with better features, graphics, and performance. You need to get the remastered version. Previous owners can do so for $10.
But you also ignoring the point that some people dont own a PS4. So they cant play it on PS5 because they dont own the game at all.
Next fallacy please.
Playing it on better hardware by default like PC, PS4 Pro & PS5, PS5 Pro gives you better experience, graphics ect, The non remaster game just recently came out and there is plenty of other older critically acclaimed games that actually deserve a remaster.
Next fallacy please.
Do you hear yourself?
You do realize you are complaining about a game that has extended support, thru its life cycle, on multiple platforms, receiving better versions to suit those platforms. Is a win for old and new players.
You are arguing just to argue at this point. Because you are bitter that other games arent being supported to PC yet. I guess when those franchises get over 38 million in sales. They will be worth SONY's time to garnish said upgrade.
HZD sold 24+ million units. What games you think SONY is going to support first? Games that sold not even half or barely a third of that? Maybe, but not until they milk the titles that actually sell better first.
It actually isn't because the more recent game released can be on multiple platforms, Therefore providing a recent title and a remastered title of another Older Acclaimed game for the similar effort thus providing 2 games which is better for customers & company profit.
Wrong, the argument that OP specified is that of remaster, not ports. That means you by default not understanding and saying ''how can it ever be played'' are arguing just to argue at this point.
This game is not HZD, The Last of Us™ Part II Remastered is of a game released in 2020 only 4 years ago, unnecessary, HZD released back in 2017 7 years ago.
TLOU 2 sales are peanuts compared to HZD and TLOU Part 1 Remake, TLOU1 came out 2013, 11 years ago, necessary.
Oh no, you are one of these people that need to start breaking every little thing down to make a point to be right. But are still so wrong.
Uh, this remaster is also a port now that its coming to PC. I guess you dont know the differences.
Yea, and TLOU2 has been out in a very small amount of time. So by that its pointless to compare. But TLOU2 did sell better and broke records on release. https://www.gamespot.com/articles/last-of-us-2-sells-4-million-in-first-three-days-s/1100-6479026/
It took HZD 2 weeks to hit 2.6 million players. When TLOU2 hit 4 million in 3 days.
https://sonyinteractive.com/en/press-releases/2017/horizon-zero-dawn-global-sales-exceed-26-million/
I mean, keep chugging. Youll catch up one day.
Ive noticed that you assume & project the type of people someone could be as a argument to try and fit them into some kind of mental gymnastic of yours once your world view is being challenged.
Again, you commented to OP, the OP was referring to the reason this game did not require a REMASTER, NOT a Port. The game can still be ported without a whole Remaster Required. I guess you eiher don't know the difference or just being disingenuous at this point.
So here comes the fallacy again, first the argument for remasters is that they need high sales, now your argument for remaster is it had less sales. make up your mind.
So what? in total HZD & TLOU Remake demolished TLOU2 in sales, again now sales don't matter anymore? you could think it may one day possibly but in reality it didn't.
I mean, keep chugging. but i doubt it will catch up one day and if it does then maybe it'll actually justify a remaster.
Aww, still breaking things down but arent going anywhere with your replies. I can see how this can be quite frustrating for you.
I didnt say in order for a remaster to be made that the sale need to be high. If you werent so mad about this topic you could probably read what I wrote better and not twist or throw words in my mouth.
Let me say again. SONY of course is going to milk franchises that have sold over 37 and 24 million in sales first. Remaster them again, release them on new platforms, with better visuals, features, performance, what have you. Way before they start to do older games that sales have not really done well.
Yea, games like Bloodborne sold almost 8 million but that took almost 7 years to get that high. Do people want that remade. Of course. But when other SONY games sell way better, over a shorter period. Of course they are going to give those games priority.
Again, I see that you are mad over these decisions, but it doesnt do anything for your argument. Nor will it get SONY to make the remasters the minority wants any faster.
So what? You said TLOU 2 sales were peanuts compared to HZD. I show you proof you are in fact wrong and TLOU2 far outsold HZD upon release. Now its so what. Lmfao. Again, try harder. You doing a terrible job at this.