The Last of Us™ Part II Remastered

The Last of Us™ Part II Remastered

View Stats:
Part 1 lol
YOU CANT make this ♥♥♥♥ up lmfao part 1 is still more expensive
< >
Showing 1-6 of 6 comments
mason Mar 31 @ 7:06am 
Ask yourself why that is.
Part 1 was a completely new engine, Part 2 uses the same engine.
episoder Mar 31 @ 7:11am 
part 1 is a complete remake. this is "just" a remaster.
Bakker Mar 31 @ 8:17am 
Originally posted by ギーマ (Guima):
YOU CANT make this ♥♥♥♥ up lmfao part 1 is still more expensive
did it ever come to mind that the part 1 remake was made from the ground up?
Originally posted by Bakker:
Originally posted by ギーマ (Guima):
YOU CANT make this ♥♥♥♥ up lmfao part 1 is still more expensive
did it ever come to mind that the part 1 remake was made from the ground up?

I have a feeling that digital foundry will compare the two and decide that Part 1 is more graphically advanced.
when i compare both PS5pro versions that I own, Part 1 looks better, but PC version is even more advanced.
The Part II remaster looks like a fake remaster, its exactly same game with ZERO graphical enhancements besides higher res textures and higher AF which is not even remaster but basic setting in every PC game. The Remaster just comes with higher res and higher FPS modes thats it.
While Part 1 was REAL full on Remaster with new graphics, models and effect.
How many games out there that Part 1 looks better than Part 2?
Originally posted by mason:
Ask yourself why that is.
Part 1 was a completely new engine, Part 2 uses the same engine.
Ah so part 2 remaster is just fluff whereas part 1 remake had all the bells and whistles of their new tech?
episoder Mar 31 @ 11:01am 
Originally posted by Hexenhammer:
The Part II remaster looks like a fake remaster, its exactly same game with ZERO graphical enhancements besides higher res textures and higher AF which is not even remaster but basic setting in every PC game. The Remaster just comes with higher res and higher FPS modes thats it.
While Part 1 was REAL full on Remaster with new graphics, models and effect.
How many games out there that Part 1 looks better than Part 2?

google the differences of remaster and remake.

part 2 has enough tech / art design under the hood to not really need a remake. the textures are not higher. it's procedural shaders that make it look higher res. it'll look good in 1080p as intended, back then. not sure how much detail is squeezed in 1440p or 4k.

the only thing that slightly dates it, are some animations. uncannyness. it's like 3-4 years of improvement apart from the part 1 remake. that's normal tho. facial capture / animation in part 1 is pretty stellar thruout the whole game.
Last edited by episoder; Mar 31 @ 11:08am
< >
Showing 1-6 of 6 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Mar 31 @ 7:04am
Posts: 6