Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I mean, just looking at the model in the Source Filmmaker or Garry's Mod confirms it, as the actual models for Slender Man and Kate have been ported over.
Wait, Lauren isnt dead? Woah, oh okay then what did lauren do to the chaser, kill her? did she kill her?
Nobody knows but the writers, they're most likely never going to tell us, and I'm 85% sure the sequel will have a different player character anyway, assuming it exists at all.
The easter egg level has no bearing on the plot. The writers themselves said it was a joke. The picture of a family is Charlie and his parents, who appear, briefly, in Memories - look to the right at the starting location.
Charlie is the monster from the Prologue, Homestead and The Arrival. The picture is Charlie's poster overlaid over Slender Man.
Charlie is not related to the main character - it's more likely that Kate is, as his and her families are revealed to have known eachother for a while (in addition to Tall, Thin and Faceless watching them) through a picture in Homestead.
...are you serious?
No.
Charles Matheson appears in Memories, though briefly, and is mentioned by the final scrap as being stalked by Slender Man, so that's not possible. Again, the secret level has no bearing on the plot whatsoever.
And, more importantly, Charlie was taken while his parents lived. You hear them crying out at the end of Memories, and Slender Man - though nowhere in sight - is very, very much there.
Even then, you might keep going with your theory. Therefore, I'll note that a picture you can find in Homestead reveals that the Mathesons have been stalked by the Slender Man for many, many years - before Charles was even born - so NOPE!
...also, that particular quote you did has no reason to be included in your theory, as it actually contradicts it. Slender Man needs people to know he exists to live, so he makes "his own son" the one type of human being that doesn't count as 'people?'
RIIIIIGHT.[/i]
THE EASTER EGG LEVEL IS A JOKE. IGNORE IT AT ALL COSTS WHEN IT COMES TO THEORIES.[/h1][/b][/i]
No, no, no. The writers have specifically stated that the Easter Egg level has nothing to do with the story.
Kate's wearing a mask. Most of Slender Man's proxies wear masks. She was never burned.
Slender Man is entirely capable of driving people completely insane and controlling their minds - though they can sometimes snap out of it, as demonstrated with Masky from Marble Hornets - which means no illusions. Slender Man cannot do illusions, or at least with beings other then himself, no matter how insignificant they may be. So... Kate is being forced to do it.
Also, if she thought Lauren was Slender Man and she wasn't a proxy, she'd have ran as if hell itself was chasing her.
Also, C.R. is not Charlie or Charles. None of the Mathesons have been stated as having ever been burned. (C.R. stands for Carl Ross, as revealed by a scrap hidden in Kate's room, I should note) Though Charlie may have been, fire does not reduce a child to being almost skeletal without killing them.
There was originally a fifth paragraph here about how one particularly popular series depicted Slender Man as being capable of resurrecting people, but it contained massive spoilers for said series if you put two and two together.
Meanwhile, I don't think she really knew what the lighter and kerosene were for. Perhaps she thought they would burn Oakside Park down, or perhaps her house, or both.
Also, I'm pretty sure that first note was by C.R., though the identity of the writer of that last one is up in the air.
This is derailing the thread and I'm getting bored anyway, so let's just stop.