Bad game

[Love in Unreality]

This is literatly a very boring, small version of Geometry Dash (GD).
If you're actually interested in buying The Impossible Game, STOP and go buy GD instead. It's WAY better. Thousands of user-made levels, many difficulties, customizable graphics, more music, etc.

This "Impossible Game" is pretty easy once you beat the few levels it has, I don't own the Steam version but I've played it on android/PC and got bored with it after a few hours. It lags a lot too, I'm sure that can be fixed or it depends on your computer but it's really not worth it. Sorry if I'm being a pain here but really... don't get The Impossible Game. Trust me, it's possible once you practice for a bit. Get Geometry Dash instead.

[Edge]

Well, you know, without The Impossible Game there would be no GD.

How does that sound?

[MrUnbecoming]

Geometry Dash is a complete ripoff of Impossible Game. All you children saying "IG is bad get GD" you're actually very ignorant. This came way before GD, and GD is a shameless ripoff that got way more popular, and overshadowed this game. Probably because it is a more polished game, but in my opinion, it shouldn't even exist. The dev should have sued.

[Elektor Saski]

Originally posted by MrUnbecoming:

Geometry Dash is a complete ripoff of Impossible Game. All you children saying "IG is bad get GD" you're actually very ignorant. This came way before GD, and GD is a shameless ripoff that got way more popular, and overshadowed this game. Probably because it is a more polished game, but in my opinion, it shouldn't even exist. The dev should have sued.

Haha hilarious u dont even get his point. IG has only 5 levels and some customs but GD has sooo much more to offer like secrets, icons, more levels, and many more user created levels. GD is much more advanced and harder plus its cheaper. Do you get it now? Its much more worth to buy GD insted of buying IG

[MrUnbecoming]

Originally posted by Piogz:

Haha hilarious u dont even get his point. IG has only 5 levels and some customs but GD has sooo much more to offer like secrets, icons, more levels, and many more user created levels. GD is much more advanced and harder plus its cheaper. Do you get it now? Its much more worth to buy GD insted of buying IG

I have both. Whether or not one is better than the other is irrelevant in this context. Impossible Game came first, and everyone is saying the IG is a ripoff of GD. Sure GD does everything better, but it's basically the same core game. It shouldn't even exist legally. I didn't say not to buy GD, just that the creator of IG should've sued, because the core gameplay is basically the same.

[Elektor Saski]

Originally posted by MrUnbecoming:

Originally posted by Piogz:

Haha hilarious u dont even get his point. IG has only 5 levels and some customs but GD has sooo much more to offer like secrets, icons, more levels, and many more user created levels. GD is much more advanced and harder plus its cheaper. Do you get it now? Its much more worth to buy GD insted of buying IG

I have both. Whether or not one is better than the other is irrelevant in this context. Impossible Game came first, and everyone is saying the IG is a ripoff of GD. Sure GD does everything better, but it's basically the same core game. It shouldn't even exist legally. I didn't say not to buy GD, just that the creator of IG should've sued, because the core gameplay is basically the same.

I agree beacuse IG came out first. However this isnt a reason for that that GD creators should be sued, It is acctualy quite different. Flying, robot, wave and others are not in IG. I also have both games and i really like both too, but i dont get ur point that GD should not exsist. It may be a remake but its much better and longer so what wrong with that?

[MrUnbecoming]

Originally posted by Piogz:

I agree beacuse IG came out first. However this isnt a reason for that that GD creators should be sued, It is acctualy quite different. Flying, robot, wave and others are not in IG. I also have both games and i really like both too, but i dont get ur point that GD should not exsist. It may be a remake but its much better and longer so what wrong with that?

Right it added all that, but I wouldn't call it a remake. More a spiritual successor. Idk, I like both games, but despite how different GD is, the core gameplay is so similar that I don't understand why the IG creator didn't at least try to sue. Sure GD made some changes here and there, I get that. But the fact remains that the core gameplay is extremely similar, and it doesn't do enough different to be safe from litigation, imo. Think about it. The base game (ignoring all the other stuff that was added) is a shape, jumping off of obstacles, to the rhythm of music. Keep in mind both were mobile games first. You tapped to jump, and that was it. But even small details like your shape spinning when you jump, the type of obstacles you encounter, and things like practice mode were all blatantly copied. I dunno, I just think it's too similar even though it added its own things.

[Elektor Saski]

Originally posted by MrUnbecoming:

Originally posted by Piogz:

I agree beacuse IG came out first. However this isnt a reason for that that GD creators should be sued, It is acctualy quite different. Flying, robot, wave and others are not in IG. I also have both games and i really like both too, but i dont get ur point that GD should not exsist. It may be a remake but its much better and longer so what wrong with that?

Right it added all that, but I wouldn't call it a remake. More a spiritual successor. Idk, I like both games, but despite how different GD is, the core gameplay is so similar that I don't understand why the IG creator didn't at least try to sue. Sure GD made some changes here and there, I get that. But the fact remains that the core gameplay is extremely similar, and it doesn't do enough different to be safe from litigation, imo. Think about it. The base game (ignoring all the other stuff that was added) is a shape, jumping off of obstacles, to the rhythm of music. Keep in mind both were mobile games first. You tapped to jump, and that was it. But even small details like your shape spinning when you jump, the type of obstacles you encounter, and things like practice mode were all blatantly copied. I dunno, I just think it's too similar even though it added its own things.

Thats true and i get it. I think we explained both our points so thank you for this little conversation. Have a nice day

[MrUnbecoming]

Originally posted by Piogz:

Originally posted by MrUnbecoming:

Right it added all that, but I wouldn't call it a remake. More a spiritual successor. Idk, I like both games, but despite how different GD is, the core gameplay is so similar that I don't understand why the IG creator didn't at least try to sue. Sure GD made some changes here and there, I get that. But the fact remains that the core gameplay is extremely similar, and it doesn't do enough different to be safe from litigation, imo. Think about it. The base game (ignoring all the other stuff that was added) is a shape, jumping off of obstacles, to the rhythm of music. Keep in mind both were mobile games first. You tapped to jump, and that was it. But even small details like your shape spinning when you jump, the type of obstacles you encounter, and things like practice mode were all blatantly copied. I dunno, I just think it's too similar even though it added its own things.

Thats true and i get it. I think we explained both our points so thank you for this little conversation. Have a nice day

Fair. Have a nice day as well, what a nice way to close out an argument lol.