Main story+ DLC = like 50 hours of gameplay?

[fade2black001]

Doesn't this seem a little short?

[weiss]

引用自 fade2black001：

Doesn't this seem a little short?

short? what is it with peoples and complaining about "too short"?

assasins creed for example has over 100hours of gameplay and do you know with what they stretch the gameplay? with collecting useless treasure chests and other dumb sidequests which NOONE needs. if you dont do anything of it and ignore everything and only do the mainstory are you in under 10 hours done with assasins creed valhalla.

i am happy that the final fantasy games dont do crap like this and IF they do get you often AWESOME things out of it such like a weapon which tops everything, not just some dumb crafting materials or a few flowers.

i would bet aswell that if FF16 would have like 100hours+ to play through would you never finish it because you have probably not the time and/or patience and move on to another game.

the problem nowadays is that games are WAY TOO LONG!
take FF14 for example: it takes you about 100hours to get even to the fun part (and where classes which is around lv 70+ getting fun to play) but peoples complain that it needs SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONG!!!!
cool or? but shouldnt they be happy that it needs long? =P

srsly, i would bet you wont finish FF16. you start another game before you are done with FF16

[RedRiot193]

引用自 Kitsububbles：

引用自 RedRiot193：

You max out your character, stronger weapons/gear (I believe there's an exclusive weapon for it could be wrong) and it changes and adds stronger enemies throughout certain areas. Instead of wolves in one area you can get a monster that appears later in the game. Can't think of what else.

Theres a fancy acradey addition to the NG+ mode that is rogue lite ish. And score attack mode.

Oh I thought those unlocked as you completed chapters. But alright one more thing.

[fade2black001]

引用自 Fulgerion：

My general rule of thumb is $1 per hour. I don't know about nowadays though.

引用自 RedRiot193：

Doing everything in this game with ng+ took me like 170 hours. And thats with skipping dialouge on side quests on ng+. So with dlc I can only imagine how long it'd take me this time since I never got it on console.

I almost didn't buy this because of NG+ crap. Ain't nobody got time or the mental health for NG+. NG+ is the more boring, and most irritating thing about games.

Your opinion

[fade2black001]

引用自 weiss：

引用自 fade2black001：

Doesn't this seem a little short?

short? what is it with peoples and complaining about "too short"?

assasins creed for example has over 100hours of gameplay and do you know with what they stretch the gameplay? with collecting useless treasure chests and other dumb sidequests which NOONE needs. if you dont do anything of it and ignore everything and only do the mainstory are you in under 10 hours done with assasins creed valhalla.

i am happy that the final fantasy games dont do crap like this and IF they do get you often AWESOME things out of it such like a weapon which tops everything, not just some dumb crafting materials or a few flowers.

i would bet aswell that if FF16 would have like 100hours+ to play through would you never finish it because you have probably not the time and/or patience and move on to another game.

the problem nowadays is that games are WAY TOO LONG!
take FF14 for example: it takes you about 100hours to get even to the fun part (and where classes which is around lv 70+ getting fun to play) but peoples complain that it needs SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONG!!!!
cool or? but shouldnt they be happy that it needs long? =P

srsly, i would bet you wont finish FF16. you start another game before you are done with FF16

FF14 is an MMO though

[weiss]

引用自 fade2black001：

FF14 is an MMO though

my opinion still stands that you probably will not finish FF16 despite its 50hour tag before you swap midgame to another game because you lost interest.

i rather have a very good game which is only 10 hours long for iunno maybe 30€ (which indiegames nowadays often do) then a game which gets artificially stretched with forced sidequests or you enter hard/nightmare mode if you dont do said things.

ubisoft proven multible times how horrible it can get and i am happy that square enix hasnt done this stuff yet.
so, you can be sure that ya have in these 50hours a GOOD game ... and not a game which tries to force you to go to this and that spot to conquer a fort or whatever and as reward get you like 5 flowers etc. >_>.

because i can tell you, assasins creed valhalla is fcking hard if you ignore all the sidequest stuff. you´re literarly forced to do it and with that stretch they artificially the game which is without the forced sidequest stuff only 5~10 hours.

[fade2black001]

引用自 weiss：

引用自 fade2black001：

FF14 is an MMO though

my opinion still stands that you probably will not finish FF16 despite its 50hour tag before you swap midgame to another game because you lost interest.

i rather have a very good game which is only 10 hours long for iunno maybe 30€ (which indiegames nowadays often do).

ubisoft proven multible times how horrible it can get and i am happy that square enix hasnt done this stuff yet.
so, you can be sure that ya have in these 50hours a GOOD game ... and not a game which tries to force you to go to this and that spot to conquer a fort or whatever and as reward get you like 5 flowers etc. >_>.

because i can tell you, assasins creed valhalla is fcking hard if you ignore all the sidequest stuff. you´re literarly forced to do it and with that stretch they artificially the game which is without the forced sidequest stuff only 5~10 hours.

Challenge accepted.

I also completed AC vahalla as well as many other AC games

[RedRiot193]

引用自 fade2black001：

引用自 weiss：

my opinion still stands that you probably will not finish FF16 despite its 50hour tag before you swap midgame to another game because you lost interest.

i rather have a very good game which is only 10 hours long for iunno maybe 30€ (which indiegames nowadays often do).

ubisoft proven multible times how horrible it can get and i am happy that square enix hasnt done this stuff yet.
so, you can be sure that ya have in these 50hours a GOOD game ... and not a game which tries to force you to go to this and that spot to conquer a fort or whatever and as reward get you like 5 flowers etc. >_>.

because i can tell you, assasins creed valhalla is fcking hard if you ignore all the sidequest stuff. you´re literarly forced to do it and with that stretch they artificially the game which is without the forced sidequest stuff only 5~10 hours.

Challenge accepted.

I also completed AC vahalla as well as many other AC games

Alright if you beat that there's no way you'll have trouble with this. I commend you. I could not get passed the part where you get a base. Twice I tried.

[M3G4 NRG M4N!]

i got about 90 hours on the base game with no DLCs on my first playtrough on ps5...

[lilac]

i had i think 70 hours and the dlc wasnt even out yet then, that was just my first playthrough, also i feel like your trolling because a 50 hour main story in a single player jrpg is not "short"

[Mad Max]

I got the complete edition for like $58.

As long as I get an hour of entertainment per dollar I will consider it a good investment.

[fade2black001]

引用自 RedRiot193：

引用自 fade2black001：

Challenge accepted.

I also completed AC vahalla as well as many other AC games

Alright if you beat that there's no way you'll have trouble with this. I commend you. I could not get passed the part where you get a base. Twice I tried.

I haven't touched the game in a long while but the best thing to use is dual wielding spears unless this has been nerfed or something.

[RedRiot193]

引用自 fade2black001：

引用自 RedRiot193：

Alright if you beat that there's no way you'll have trouble with this. I commend you. I could not get passed the part where you get a base. Twice I tried.

I haven't touched the game in a long while but the best thing to use is dual wielding spears unless this has been nerfed or something.

Well I meant that I found those games so boring I couldn't play any further, especially valhalla. I still would like to give odyssey a shot some time in the future.

[Therieri]

引用自 Andr3wWw：

I'd rather be entertained in 20 than bored in 100

Well said! Hard agree!

[fade2black001]

引用自 RedRiot193：

引用自 fade2black001：

I haven't touched the game in a long while but the best thing to use is dual wielding spears unless this has been nerfed or something.

Well I meant that I found those games so boring I couldn't play any further, especially valhalla. I still would like to give odyssey a shot some time in the future.

Oh

[Therieri]

引用自 Fulgerion：

引用自 Red Duke：

Most games that take 100+ hours to complete are barely ever completed if you look at achievement completion rates. Even those with side content that stretches into 100+ hours you see a similar pattern. Achievements have the lowest unlock rate

Achievement is the main reason I hate gaming nowadays. They instantly turn something fun, not fun.

True. Even though some games have fun achievements (opinions might differ). As example Hollow Knight or Black Mesa as example. Or even Halls of Torment. But some games have awful ones!