Установить Steam
войти
|
язык
简体中文 (упрощенный китайский)
繁體中文 (традиционный китайский)
日本語 (японский)
한국어 (корейский)
ไทย (тайский)
Български (болгарский)
Čeština (чешский)
Dansk (датский)
Deutsch (немецкий)
English (английский)
Español - España (испанский)
Español - Latinoamérica (латиноам. испанский)
Ελληνικά (греческий)
Français (французский)
Italiano (итальянский)
Bahasa Indonesia (индонезийский)
Magyar (венгерский)
Nederlands (нидерландский)
Norsk (норвежский)
Polski (польский)
Português (португальский)
Português-Brasil (бразильский португальский)
Română (румынский)
Suomi (финский)
Svenska (шведский)
Türkçe (турецкий)
Tiếng Việt (вьетнамский)
Українська (украинский)
Сообщить о проблеме с переводом
Тема закрыта 
Правила обсуждений
Пожаловаться
oh wait he's op LOL i didn't even realize, they're all the same hivemind at this point tbh
What's incredible is you are yet to provide an example other then a projected opinion.
So let's use the actual logic, what if Taratino decides to remove the blood from the film himself? Is that now censorship or are you just projecting it?
Rouge hasn't stopped being a bombshell, well unless you define "bombshell" by "Has cleavage"
You do realise that all the Sonic characters have changed over the years from front line, side line and odd time characters.
As I said and have said to you multiple times, change isn't censorship just because you project that it is and at the end of the day you are literally arguing about CGI polygons like it's the end of the world as we know it.
Seriously, grow up.
You are yet to provide any evidence other than being irked by it.
Things change, move on. At this point you are reaching old man yells at cloud territory.
2. Rouge hasn't stopped being a bombshell... yet. Cleavage isn't synonymous with bombshell, but when you go around adding centimeters of a character's back and cleavage because it's very revealing, it's like the 50s where they measured women's bathing suits, it's pathetic and makes no sense.
3. All of Sonic's characters have changed... and what's your point? Here Rouge isn't being changed for a reason like it needs to be improved, they're censoring it because from one year to the next it seems like low-cut tops aren't allowed and showing too much back is too lewd...
4. It's censorship, bro. I've swept you off your feet as I wanted, you have no idea what censorship is. And you say to me: "mature", when yesterday you were defending multimillionaire companies with their anti-consumer practices, but nice try. And no, I've never said it's the end of the world, I'm just talking about how pathetic it is to normalize censorship worthy of 4kidz, censorship that people used to make fun of because it was stupid and now we have idiots defending it, justifying it or ignoring it.
I mean you haven't, a list isn't proof. It's a list. Supposition isn't evidence.
1) Congratulations, you've learnt what change and censorship is. Now prove that there was censorship and not change. As you point out it's not the original creator that's done this remake, that means it is a new project. Which gives them creative control, the choice to make changes is not censorship, a point I've been trying to educate you on for a while.
2) You are right it is pathetic and makes no sense, something else I've been pointing out to you. You are the one measuring the characters worth and value by how much skin they show while projecting that "oh my god the took away skin therefore censorship." You are the walking example of what you claim you are against.
3) Again you are just projecting your own insecurities and worth of others based on skin, cleavage or other metric you deem as sexualisation. Objectification isn't a good trait to have but you'll learn that when you grow up. I mean you've already admitted your self worth comes from achievements and likes.
4) I've not once defended any company, I've tried to explain stuff to you, yet nuance and situational awareness is also lost on you. I'm going to point it out again change is not censorship unless you can prove it is. We knew for a fact what 4Kids did was censorship, do you know why? We have the literal TV broadcasting guidelines they had to work to to have the show air in the US, which if you haven't read the history of censorship in TV and movies in the US I highly recommend it as some of those guidelines were bizarre.
See your biggest problem here is you are irked at a change and you are projecting a reason because you want a reason to be mad, on the other hand I'm telling you how the real world works and you are annoyed at that as well. You also don't seem to be too fond of people laughing at the shouty minority like we should rally behind the idiocy over some CGI polygons. Hate to be the bearer of bad news the majority won't because the majority doesn't care.
By all means continue shouting into the void, it's not going to change anything for you or for me. You will continue to be angry and not buy the game, you won't even make a mark on the balance sheet, nothing will change to your whim but do everyone else a favour and learn from what people tell you. Education will get you further in life then being angry at a nothing burger.
You like me to sweep the floor with you, don't you?
You have terrible reading comprehension, you have zero knowledge of censorship.
1. Do you think that creating something "new" gives you the right to modify it? If that's the case, then I'm going to write Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, keeping the whole story, but changing the words that I don't like, since it's a new product... I can do whatever I want and it's not censorship. Again, you just showed that you don't know what censorship is, therefore, you have no validity whatsoever.
2. You used 2 different points to say the same ♥♥♥♥ that only an idiot would say. Next time let's put burkas on the characters since their clothing has no intention, and the fact that the creators of Rouge created her to be a sexy character is of no importance, because an Englishman wants to give an opinion without having knowledge of anything.
3. Objectification is bad, but you can't objectify fictional characters, nice try. You seem to be straight out of Reddit or Twitter, another argument that shows you're a guy who can't be taken seriously.
4. "Change isn't censorship unless you prove it is," again proving that you have no idea what censorship is. I'll explain it to you in simple terms so that your head understands it... when you create a character that has cleavage and then the executives come to change it, it's censorship, because there's a censor who imposes a change, unless you prove that its designer has approved the change without any kind of pressure, it's censorship from here to the moon.
5. A lot of text to prove that you're a guy who calls us crybabies, screamers, or whatever, but the mere fact that you're still here shows that you're affected by guys who are supposedly wrong showing valid discontent. I was going to buy the game, but the fact that it's localized in a worse way by Sega of America made me save my money. Now back to the point, you talk about the real world, when it is clear that in your life you have never picked up a shovel, defended anti-consumer practices, defended unnecessary changes that if they were not important... then they would not have been made.
It was a pleasure to have swept the floor with you again.