Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Personally I can't wait to see LA Naba
I am personnaly more curious about LA Pyrene but LA Naba interest me to!
You are probably right but I am not really the modding type. And a player can always dream. :)
Yes, the game indeed has (comparatively) very few Asian or American nations and not a lot of African ones. That's why the idea is more of a mixt than a "pure" European nation.
That said, the western European nation, bland "knight" seems pretty popular: in the six multiplayer games (mostly for newbies) in MA and LA that I play, all have Man and Marignon and four have Ulm. Granted, I am the one who picked Marignon or Man in 4 of them but I still think it's a sign that there are still picks when I don't. :D Of course, it's not a true sample.
Interesting, thanks for answering.
To come back to your previous point, you are right, these 3 nations represent a lot of the heavy cavalry in MA (althought the Ulm one are not sacred). That's change in LA, with Marignon loosing cavalry entierly, Man sacred becoming infantry and some other nations obtaining heavy cav (Arco by example).
After, it was just a personal impression. I suppose with more games I will have a better idea to the popularity of all the nations. :)