Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
LA Atlantis
EA Mictlan
MA Mictlan
LA Mictlan
EA Xibalba
MA Xibalba
LA Xibalba
But it would be nice to see something from the plains or eastern woodlands.
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3142360502&searchtext=
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3141508624&searchtext=
Also i thought Nidavangr is kinda North America as like the Movie Pathfinder Vibes and having Contact with Vanheim. Having those Viking Unit Names could be just that Vanheim calls them those, would be not new in the Series that some Names are relative.
Yes, it's a delicate topic. Representation is a great goal but it can be difficult to keep it respectful. It doesn't help that there are so few historical primary sources to go by, which means that not only is there scant information, most of what we have is based on living cultural memories. If you want to base a nation on myths that are reasonably removed from extant cultures there's just not much that goes back far enough.
So I suspect that North American representation is probably going to remain mostly the domain of modders, who are free to make their own calls on how to approach sensitive cultural issues. For what it's worth I think the Bagwajini mod probably has a good approach: it doesn't try to directly represent a specific indigenous culture or religion, it's based on their folklore about other mythical beings.
It's how Illwinter did Judaism with Hinnom, seemed the best approach. There's an old interview floating on the internet of a Jewish man talking about Hinnom and how he liked Illwinter's depiction.
Native believes is a complex subject but there certainly some groups with a decent catalogue of their culture. My first recommendation is seeking out story collections of the people themselves but that can be tricky. You can pretty much ignore any 19th century publication as that will be trash.
Those are more Central Americans though
The main difference between Jewish culture and Native American cultures is the degree to which the myths are preserved; Judaism is well-recorded throughout history, but native american belief has some missing parts, and these can get distorted and harder to reconstruct when fictional works play off them - for example, when Dominions becomes a higher result in a google search than someone's blog where the actual belief is detailed. It's not a general case with all mythologies, but rather a specific historical effect of the disruption of their oral tradition.
There are some other examples in the world, both from extinct groups (the Vikings particularly) and extant ones, with the extant ones more important to be careful with.
The countries that are in North America are Canada and the US.
Yes, the distinction between extant/extinct culture is an important one and part of what I was getting at: most of the information we have on historical North American cultures comes via oral transmission from extant groups that still identify as those cultures. We know of various extinct North American societies that might theoretically be more appropriate but having no written record and limited archaeological evidence there's not a ton of material to work with.
EDIT: You may be thinking of Mesoamerica, which does include the Aztecs and much of southern and central Mexico but is not the same as Central America. Mesoamerica is more of a cultural and historical region that's rarely invoked today, other than for its historical context; Central America is a comparatively more recent designation of a political and economic region. Much of pre-colonial Mexico was part of Mesoamerica, which did include the Aztecs, but no part of Mexico qualifies as Central America.