Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
RD is a fun game that is still beloved by many, there's some good money to be made here by making new dlc of stuff that people want.
The thing with Call of Duty is that each year the old one becomes obsolete, hence why Activision isn't doing it. Nothing wrong about that.
However you have 14 year old games that still get updates, I will say that WARNO and War Game Red Dragon are different enough to where there is room for both.
Because Warno is good on paper, but most people I know, including me, stopped after some time because the gameplay isn't as fun as in Wargame. Most matches you just grind along a line for 40 mins. Going back and forth a little bit. I haven't really seen a decisive win in a warno match until now.