The case for North Korean Armoured

[acur1231]

I made a North Korean armoured deck, and I can honestly say it is not that bad. You get lots of tanks with decent AP values and which are spammable, like T-72 knockoffs and the Chonma Hos. Back them up with the T-90Ss and you have a good pushing force, especially in 10v10s.

However, I think that the tanks should be made cheaper still, to reinforce the cheap tank spam that the Norks should be good at. Same for the Chinese. Then those decks might actually become meta.

[PeOpLe]

you forgot those OP aa tanks and inf vehicles....

[Zeno]

Originally posted by acur1231:

I made a North Korean armoured deck, and I can honestly say it is not that bad. You get lots of tanks with decent AP values and which are spammable, like T-72 knockoffs and the Chonma Hos. Back them up with the T-90Ss and you have a good pushing force, especially in 10v10s.

However, I think that the tanks should be made cheaper still, to reinforce the cheap tank spam that the Norks should be good at. Same for the Chinese. Then those decks might actually become meta.

If you play NK as aggressive as possible, it is a very effective country to play.

[IvanChe]

Am playing with North deck, and its very good and effective if it can fit in your playing style. I like to use aa transport hwasung-chong with bochongsu in it, couple of times got F15 planes..and Chonma-ho tanks with igla to. Good AA Pon'gae 2, anti-tank plane Su-25K, special force Jengchaldae 90' and ofc B-5 with MiG-29 escort. Low range MiG but its ok for small 1v1 maps.
NK is good for 1v1 or 2v2 maps, maybe not so effective on bigger maps because vehicles run out of fuel before reach battlefield and 4500m MiG

[Viss Valdyr]

Originally posted by mouadood:

North korea never had T-90S and there is only a small possibility that they had T-72

we don't care about reallife here, bro

[Viss Valdyr]

Originally posted by mouadood:

Then you dont mind getting rid of the W. German Tornado and replacing it with another F117 right? Because thats the north korean counter part and we dont care about real life :D

why are you trying to derail this thread?

[Zeno]

Originally posted by Viss Valdyr:

Originally posted by mouadood:

Then you dont mind getting rid of the W. German Tornado and replacing it with another F117 right? Because thats the north korean counter part and we dont care about real life :D

why are you trying to derail this thread?

Why are you trolling people? Hang yourself and do all of us a favour.

[Viss Valdyr]

Originally posted by Styx_Surfer92:

Hang yourself and do all of us a favour.

you don't mind that I report that, do you? Because you should never go that low, matey.
(says the guy, who claims that the community is toxic and being very toxic himself)

[Zeno]

Originally posted by Viss Valdyr:

Originally posted by Styx_Surfer92:

Hang yourself and do all of us a favour.

you don't mind that I report that, do you? Because you should never go that low, matey.
(says the guy, who claims that the community is toxic and being very toxic himself)

Go for it, but please take the advise, sleeping pills will probably do the job too.

[Viss Valdyr]

Originally posted by mouadood:

Sorry I guess in a game using real vehicles and real tactic I expect it to have some form of realism. Giving North Korea a units they never had kinda throwns everything out the window

well there are many units like that. The T-90s is just a T-72BU without the rocket. Which is a T-90 of some sort. If the timeline is woven that way, let's say, russia lend some to them... yes I know, it is a stretch, but hey.

[Viss Valdyr]

Originally posted by Styx_Surfer92:

Go for it, but please take the advise, sleeping pills will probably do the job too.

and another report, thank you very much

[Zeno]

Originally posted by Viss Valdyr:

Originally posted by Styx_Surfer92:

Go for it, but please take the advise, sleeping pills will probably do the job too.

and another report, thank you very much

Reported your ass several times too

[Viss Valdyr]

Originally posted by Styx_Surfer92:

Originally posted by Viss Valdyr:

and another report, thank you very much

Reported your ass several times too

tsk tsk tsk... what for? I don't promote suicide in a way, do I? Ok no more derailing here.

For mou:

It is also the name of the most current SPG in the NK arsenal today. The T-54/55 were modernized to some extent, as well as the T-62 that were derived into the Chonma-Ho (1981) and around 200 T-72 were obtained at scrap metal value after the dissolution of the USSR, and then modernized in several batches as the Popkung-Ho (1992).

ok it is a skretch but let's take this as "they obtained T-72"... somehow.

[Zhar_to]

Take a look at the T-62D.

[IceWord]

No is not,a good armored force will be without major weakness.Some nation has crazy combination effect like Japan,6 kyumaru doomstack but other than that,they got nothing.
There aren't many nation suit this other than UK USSR.

[acur1231]

Originally posted by BTTLSTARIceWord:

No is not,a good armored force will be without major weakness.Some nation has crazy combination effect like Japan,6 kyumaru doomstack but other than that,they got nothing.
There aren't many nation suit this other than UK USSR.

Seriously, try it. While I usually do a large Challenger and Marksmen push, I found that the North Korean Armoured is not nearly as bad as most people think. Sure, i think that the Asian countries could do with a 5 point buff on everything(free reservists anyone?), but even now you can get a pretty powerful push, lots of 40 point tanks with decent guns, Chonma Hos for that 19 AP and then T-90s bringing up the rear.