Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
The politics behind it is actually interesting and important. Every Delta Force game had.... Delta Force in it, and yet, this version, which supposedly wants be a sequel to Delta Force, albeit updated to the modern era and with technological advances, makes no mention of US Delta Force operatives or their enemies.
My understanding is that game developers are under immense pressure from the US State Department not to feature combat between US soldiers and their enemies. Some will recall the controversy over the 2010 Medal of Honour game, where initially players could choose to be the US Army or the Taliban. A huge fanfare was whipped up, compelling EA to capitulate and change the names of both sides, even though the game was set in and clearly based on the war in Afghanistan.
I wouldn't be surprised if the lack of explicit reference to the U.S. Army and Delta Force is motivated by similar underpinnings.
Well thats exactly my point. This entire game is based off of US "assets" and yet when you read descriptions in game of weapons or vehicles it only mentions Russian and chinese made weapons. I believe one gun says made in Germany. The rest exists but for some reason it does not mention the origin which of course is the US.