Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Two very good things in my opinion. I'm cautiously optimistic.
So, who cares?
Battlefield doesn't have to be the only game using that formula, and it also killed itself, so we might as well play this.
Because criticizing a video game you don't play is exactly the kind of logic weirdos like yourself love to adhere to. I can criticize a game that I play, period. Moreover, name me one alternative in the market that has a reasonable enough population, that has conquest style play, and in this scale... Pro tip: you can't... because it doesn't exist.
And even if the game is a copy, maybe we will have a finished product on release for a change.