Why Operators

[Scraf]

Can we just go back to having our own basic soldier with a bit of customisation, seeing the same 4 people x100 running around is wack

[Mega]

They will sell ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ model thing so....

[ElviraDemonQueen]

Originally posted by Scraf:

Can we just go back to having our own basic soldier with a bit of customisation, seeing the same 4 people x100 running around is wack

then dont play it

[Elemeno.]

I also can't stand operators .. or overpowered abilities ... They should fix this before release , would make the game a million times better

[Eury]

Originally posted by ElviraDemonQueen:

Originally posted by Scraf:

Can we just go back to having our own basic soldier with a bit of customisation, seeing the same 4 people x100 running around is wack

then dont play it

Yes let's be toxic and encourage people to leave so that the population drops and then the game is dead within half a year and devs bail ...

[viperwolf02]

Operators or specialist or whatever they are called is something I hated in 2042, I played it about a month and was done. However, I will welcome a BF style game that is not EA. Just hope the devs keep it about the game and not BS agendas. Time will tell.

[Rilgar55]

Depends on how well the handle operators and how much customization we get on them, but yeah, i rather have classes

[Diro]

I come from the original "Delta force" "DF2" "Delta force: Xtreme" And "DF:Task force dagger" etc, like these games are part of the original reason to why fps even exist in this day and age.

My god id love to just see another big proper 32/32 - 64/64 player based games....

Being a sniper with camo in DF 1 and 2 days was the epitome of PROPER camouflage.

[Localmind]

Be sure to make your voice heard in their various surveys and forums as well. Already a "alpha survey" available in the mailbox section in the game.

I made sure to say my suggestion/feedback of Operators, in that, remove them completely. The only major flaw honestly. I don't want "Battlefield 2042 2"

[Buntkreuz]

All these games now want the Rainbow Six Siege Operator Money.
Ubisoft showed it can be lucrative and design wise its not hard to implement them compared to blank classes but at the same time the company gets a lot of space to add monetization.

So Operators are the new platform for microtransactions without any disadvantage for the developer or publisher.

I also hate Operators. Blank Soldiers as in Bad Company were the absolute best.

[Scraf]

Originally posted by Buntkreuz:

All these games now want the Rainbow Six Siege Operator Money.
Ubisoft showed it can be lucrative and design wise its not hard to implement them compared to blank classes but at the same time the company gets a lot of space to add monetization.

So Operators are the new platform for microtransactions without any disadvantage for the developer or publisher.

I also hate Operators. Blank Soldiers as in Bad Company were the absolute best.

Yeah I mean Siege isnt even a Rainbow Six game really. They just slapped the name on for sales since so many people were waiting for a new one and they screwed up so many other games in the progress.

[MayTheSchwartzBeWithYou]

This game has this too? Shame really, I know people don't mind it but in games like these we just want to run around as grunts, not Shelly from Tampa Florida. Having the same characters running around would get tiresome. Also was seeing that this is gonna be free to play has me a bit worried, another live service game?

[nail.json]

Originally posted by Eury:

Originally posted by ElviraDemonQueen:

then dont play it

Yes let's be toxic and encourage people to leave so that the population drops and then the game is dead within half a year and devs bail ...

maybe design a good video game from the start?

[Rilgar55]

Originally posted by MayTheSchwartzBeWithYou:

This game has this too? Shame really, I know people don't mind it but in games like these we just want to run around as grunts, not Shelly from Tampa Florida. Having the same characters running around would get tiresome. Also was seeing that this is gonna be free to play has me a bit worried, another live service game?

Every multyplayer game is a live service game

[ArmedGhost-]

Were my same thoughts. Wish we would just get a traditional BF game without these goofy ass operators.

To me it seems there's more profit to a model without operators, having a basic generic soldier, but allowing for customization like how BFV had.

Don't get the appeal or reasoning why gaming is going in this direction of this hero shooter bullsh!t. Seeing how they are pretty much copying BF, you'd think they know about how hated the operators are in 2042.

[ArmedGhost-]

Originally posted by ElviraDemonQueen:

Originally posted by Scraf:

Can we just go back to having our own basic soldier with a bit of customisation, seeing the same 4 people x100 running around is wack

then dont play it

deadbeat mentality.

Hawk ops would be 100% better if they dumped this ass operators and went with generic soldiers and gave players the freedom to customize their soldiers.