Honestly, remove the Operators and you're Golden.

[Localmind]

I like everything else about it. Sure some improvements to make but everything else I like about it but the Operators. The main thing that drew me away from Battlefield 2024. Freaking Boris shooting Boris while Boris gets stabbed in the back by....you guessed it.....Steve....who then is sniped by Steve. HA.

Give us 2 factions, generic Soldier, maybe fact customization and the game would honestly be perfect to me. Since it's going for free to play, you could charge for boots, gloves, facemasks etc.

I think theses guys do surveys for feedback so next test I see a feedback this what I'm going to tell them.

Conclusion: Remove Operators, add actual factions and it's perfect. I'm fully in if you remove operators.

[kalashnjkov21]

i'm fine with operators but operators on both sides need to look different. Operators give unique playstyle but still keep the balance, why not?
In BF4, we just have 4 types of character face on both sides and always same loadout, what is the difference between generic soldier system and operator syste? It's operator 's abilities, i dont think having more contents like this does any harm.

[Localmind]

Originally posted by kalashnjkov21:

i'm fine with operators but operators on both sides need to look different. Operators give unique playstyle but still keep the balance, why not?
In BF4, we just have 4 types of character face on both sides and always same loadout, what is the difference between generic soldier system and operator syste? It's operator 's abilities, i dont think having more contents like this does any harm.

In BF4, they were stylized in a way where when I'm in the "battlefield" nobody looked like a clone of each other (even though technically they were).

Both sides for sure need a different look yes. But remove the operator system, it's not needed. Class Based is great.

I'm all for innovation, but there is innovation and other elements that feel forced, Operators seems forced.

[kalashnjkov21]

Originally posted by Localmind:

Originally posted by kalashnjkov21:

i'm fine with operators but operators on both sides need to look different. Operators give unique playstyle but still keep the balance, why not?
In BF4, we just have 4 types of character face on both sides and always same loadout, what is the difference between generic soldier system and operator syste? It's operator 's abilities, i dont think having more contents like this does any harm.

In BF4, they were stylized in a way where when I'm in the "battlefield" nobody looked like a clone of each other (even though technically they were).

Both sides for sure need a different look yes. But remove the operator system, it's not needed. Class Based is great.

I'm all for innovation, but there is innovation and other elements that feel forced, Operators seems forced.

Removing operators means we wont have fun abilities like triple grenade spam of D wolf or jump jetback of veyron. Your suggestions dont make any sense.

[Localmind]

Originally posted by kalashnjkov21:

Originally posted by Localmind:

In BF4, they were stylized in a way where when I'm in the "battlefield" nobody looked like a clone of each other (even though technically they were).

Both sides for sure need a different look yes. But remove the operator system, it's not needed. Class Based is great.

I'm all for innovation, but there is innovation and other elements that feel forced, Operators seems forced.

Removing operators means we wont have fun abilities like triple grenade spam of D wolf or jump jetback of veyron. Your suggestions dont make any sense.

Everything I said makes sense. You have tons of "Hero Shooters" out there to choose from if you want that.

On top of that, you can simply make these gadgets usable by anyone and there's your fun back. If you really need those gadgets.

[kalashnjkov21]

Originally posted by Localmind:

Originally posted by kalashnjkov21:

Removing operators means we wont have fun abilities like triple grenade spam of D wolf or jump jetback of veyron. Your suggestions dont make any sense.

Everything I said makes sense. You have tons of "Hero Shooters" out there to choose from if you want that.

On top of that, you can simply make these gadgets usable by anyone and there's your fun back. If you really need those gadgets.

But, some skill like overload is related to D-Wolf exoskeleton suit, if devs do that, they will have extra works like design exoskeleton suit for every type of character bodies existed.

[Dim]

That trending Gender Lock specialist system is just lame. Why everyone must copy R6 style? Why Sniper is locked at Luna only? Battlefield 5 had the best system. Play as everyone you want, and use any look you want.

[mariovic20]

I think this choice operaters over Soldier class is bad and if this game wants to shine over battlefield 2042 i don't understand why mimic the worst things in battlefield OPERATORS!! PLEASE REMOVE THIS! Why can't we have real soldiers instead of operators with crazy gadgets and this is bound to get worst once more operaters are released...then its going to turn into RAINBOW SIX SIEGE ON STEROIDS!!...PLEASE! No operaters just normal soldiers with classes!

[snickii]

they do it do sell skins, thats all. I dont like them

[Localmind]

Originally posted by Nux Vomic:

That trending Gender Lock specialist system is just lame. Why everyone must copy R6 style? Why Sniper is locked at Luna only? Battlefield 5 had the best system. Play as everyone you want, and use any look you want.

Agreed. Now you say Rainbow Six but I LOVED (especially) Rainbow Six Vegas and Vegas 2. Siege is fine, (at least both sides you have different people), but I do miss what made Rainbow Six.....Rainbow Six ( Ready or Not has given me that true Rainbow Six feel and I play it). That's another story though.

Agreed though on your statement.

[Kälävätys]

Originally posted by Localmind:

On top of that, you can simply make these gadgets usable by anyone and there's your fun back. If you really need those gadgets.

I know the single player as of now should be a bit more current time and the multiplayer a bit more futuristic, but what I think the devs should do is have both time frames on mp so you could choose do you want to play the so-called "hero shooter" or the older style.

But I also have to say I love this mentality of demanding the game developers to change the core mechanics of their game because you just don't like it. Nothing wrong asking them to do that, they probably won't but never hurts to ask. But demanding it like they owe you that is just so very entitled.

[Trypticon#3]

Well, this game is NOT Delta Force. It seems they have no idea what DF actually is. They're treating it like they're just some random soldiers running around on a ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ battlefield.
Also, just FYI: To this day, not a single female has ever passed the training to become an actual Delta member. Futuristic hero shooter and DF are MILES apart. This is just another COD clone, tbh. Really disappointed so far.