Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
William made up his philosophy (and he is the only adherent) to explain the world as he sees it, I don't think it is any kind of foreshadowing or the like.
The dialogue and the views of the old man are pretty amazing writing, imho.
That's fair. I have played other cRPGs where inconsequential dialogues, even without proper connective glue, would foreshadow certain elements later on. Usually from a random npc. So I often wondered if this was a similar scenario.
It is good writing as it contrasts greatly with Professor Oakfield and his more academic approach based on the scientific method and solid evidence rather than the Ferryman's "scavenged" philosophy. Essentially, putting the great contrast between wisdom v. intelligence stat or philosophy v. modern science.