Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
"♥♥♥♥ you" is a nice answer
The answer is, overgrowth is being developed by a group of people. Maybe some of them are furríes, but u can't tell because they are professionals and most of the time they avoiding these questions. jezzz, they even "overlooked" a question, if sexscenes will be featured in overgrowth. so yeah they are doing the american approach: a game about animals with realistic gore effects, but please no sex which seems to be too much realistic!
My best bet: picking rabbits over humans wasn't a design choice, but a choice of effort.
overgrowth do has furry fans.
Actually, picking bunnies over humans WAS a design choice. They had three reasons for this design choice:
1. Bunnies would allow for other species aswell to exist within the lore (wolves, cats, dogs, rats)
2. Bunnies, and other animals, are far more flexible and have better potential for parkour, running, powerful hits etc.
3. He deemed the nature of the game to be too brutal if it were to feature humans and thus decided to use animals instead.
the reason a lot of people are offended is bc it was implied that furries are bad.
…Woah, got a necromancer here!