Which is better? Battlefield 3 vs Battlefield Bad Company 2

[djava]

and explain, why?

[chris3069]

Battlefield 3 has better graphic designs but in bf3 are lot more campers.
In battlefield 3 u have more servers and weapons etc.
For bf3 you need a very well mainboard and CPU/GPU
If i had a gamer pc i would buy bf3 ... but i don't have one

[druttN]

They are both good games, I got both and run bf3 on ultra, sure the graphics is better and community is bigger, but I prefer bad company 2.

It got a better feel to it in my opinion, better maps, ironsight weapons, better sound and.. snow maps!! (Not sure but I think bf3 also got one with the armored kill dlc) and of course the vietnam dlc which is pure awesomness.

The only thing I miss going from bf3 to bc2 is that you run so much slower that it feels like crawling the first 20 minutes before you get used to it again, and that you can't strafe run. Another good thing about bc2 is that you can't prone so it's easier to spot those pesky snipers.

[Orange]

I prefer bfbc2's gameplay. The maps feel much more balanced and well thought out. BF3 to me feels like, "Lets make everything bigger." was decided upon before making actual fun maps to play on.

[BONKERS]

BC2's SQDM is by far one of the most balanced DM mode's i've played in years. And is worth playing BC just for that.

Only problems with the game is that you run into some hitreg problems once in a while. Which can be frustrating.

[Onyx]

Personally, I perfer Bad Company 2 over Battlefield 3 anyday. I play both games at a regular basis, but I find that Battlefield 3 has much less teamwork, people are often doing their own thing. The maps are often poorly designed despite its graphic superiority. Bad Company 2 in my opnion, has much better infantry system and vehicle system where neither is overpowered.

[John "Böri" Wayne]

I like Battlefield 3 but Premium killed the game, some of you should know what i mean.

[Echoplex25]

Battlefield Bad Company 2 is far Superior, Battlefield 3 is just terrible, maps where made for close quarters as no one can't even drive anything flyable, people don't support you only supress and thats all, not only that but it has a terrible community. Bad Company 2 looks better because it isn't limited to a certain degree and stuck with a blue tint, game is colourful and the weapons vary and everyone supports you.

[Chokedcherry]

i enjoy BFBC2 alot more, it feels just much beter.

[(FSA) Morshu the Shopkeeper]

Bad Company 2 is way better, because the gameplay of BF3 resembles to much with CoD

[djava]

Originally posted by (FSA) Morshu the Shopkeeper:

Bad Company 2 is way better, because the gameplay of BF3 resembles to much with CoD

The same view

[Mabwar]

are you kidding? BC2 has balanced weapons and classes for a start! the graphics are far more stable and personally i prefer them. destruction, better netcode, better maps, blah blah blah BC2 rips the turd out of battlefail 3 any day. BF3 is what i play if i just dont care about K/D and fancy a change from USUAL COD

[Sabo]

BC2 because it doesn't have blue filter in the game.

[=EV=]

BF3 has great visuals but poor game mechanics such as suppression and vehicle disablement :(, Bc2 has far superior gunplay and need more skill than point and click BF3.
If you want pretty=BF3
Gameplay=Bc2 (cheaper too)
I gave my copy of BF3 to my friends 7yr old son as he has the skill level for the point and lock on element of it.

[Jiggybuff]

Originally posted by -=EV3RY=-:

BF3 has great visuals but poor game mechanics such as suppression and vehicle disablement :(, Bc2 has far superior gunplay and need more skill than point and click BF3.
If you want pretty=BF3
Gameplay=Bc2 (cheaper too)
I gave my copy of BF3 to my friends 7yr old son as he has the skill level for the point and lock on element of it.

Wow that's the most idiotic statement of the day. All first person shooter games have point and click mechanic. Wtf are you smoking? *facepalm*

[Manby]

I like both alothough bf3 has better graphics, in bf2 you can blow up more buildings and enter more.