A Game Made in 2010 (BC2) Is Better Than Any Current 2012-2019 Battlefield Game...

[$𝖒𝔬𝗸𝖊]

I sometimes think about this when I am playing Bad Company 2 online via Steam, which by the way, has more players on more concurrent servers than BFV or BF1... Oh and that's right by the way, a Battlefield game on Steam and not garbage Origin. When I first played this game back in 2010, it was groundbreaking in terms of innovation, destruction, gun sounds, map design and overall gameplay in the multiplayer AND the campaign and when I look at any Battlefield games made today in 2019, or any Battlefield released after Battlefield 3 for that matter, it has been a complete step backwards in terms of fun, quality and innovation from what I have noticed when trying any of the newer Battlefields from the years of 2012 to 2019. How is it possible that a game made in 2010 was so ahead of its time that EVEN NOW, IN 2019, Bad Company 2 has better multiplayer and campaign than most all of the current Battlefields. And I have played every Battlefield game since Battlefield 2 back in 2005...

I would be embarrassed if I were DICE or EA to be honest. To give us such a good and outstanding game like Bad Company 2 and MAYBE Battlefield 3 and then just constantly go downhill in terms of quality with each year after Battlefield 3, with each Battlefield after Battlefield 3 being boring, yawn-inducing and non-innovative. This decrease in quality is even apparent by the comical low numbers of people on servers as well as no one streaming any of the current Battlefields. I sometimes wonder if it is because they are forced to be on a time crunch to develop a game at least every 1-2 years, because I know that Bad Company 2 took at least 3 years since it was being developed right before the end of Bad Company 1 development (2007). It's just a shame really, you won't find much actual fun action first-person shooter these days except maybe PUBG, Modern Warfare Remastered, and even this game is only well compatible with PS4 only and not PC and then Bad Company 2, this is all we have. I just hope it at least gets better in the future in terms of fun First Person Shooters to play... I hope they come out with Bad Company 3 in the future OR AT LEAST Bad Company 2 remastered.

[Good Onion]

Other battlefields after bc2 just have more useless details, not a new gameplay or innovative things.
Seems DICE think if they add useless details in the game, their game become better thing.
Yeah the REALITY part will be ok by this, but people want to have fun in the game.
In the middle of battle who cares that your gun get dirty by mud around you?!
No one! People even won't pay attention to it when there is a tank in front of them.

[$𝖒𝔬𝗸𝖊]

Originally posted by Good Onion:

Other battlefields after bc2 just have more useless details, not a new gameplay or innovative things.
Seems DICE think if they add useless details in the game, their game become better thing.
Yeah the REALITY part will be ok by this, but people want to have fun in the game.
In the middle of battle who cares that your gun get dirty by mud around you?!
No one! People even won't pay attention to it when there is a tank in front of them.

I agree, I just hope they make AT LEAST as good of a game as Bad Company 2 in the future, if not better. Hopefully one day.

[Karla]

Hola a tod@s chic@s.
Hace poquito termine la campaña y es de las mejores que he jugado.

[Good Onion]

The first battlefield I played was 2142.
And it was a great game, I really mean it. After that I saw bc2. It was a huge game on it's time cause I didn't saw such a sound design in a FPS games like COD. And I mostly played cod multiplayer but when I saw the destruction system in bc2 I said to myself that how good and fun this mp can be! And it was.
After that I mostly played bc2 mp just because of destruction system.

And one thing that I have to mention is in bc2 weapons has character by their sound. Each one the weapons in bc2 has a unique and completely different sound compare to other guns.

The first time I played bf3, I noticed that sound of guns in it are a little similar to each other.


And the destruction system is fading out in new battlefield games after bc2. You won't find a map in other bfs that completely destroy after one game (something like oasis or arica harbor in bc2).

[$𝖒𝔬𝗸𝖊]

Originally posted by Good Onion:

The first battlefield I played was 2142.
And it was a great game, I really mean it. After that I saw bc2. It was a huge game on it's time cause I didn't saw such a sound design in a FPS games like COD. And I mostly played cod multiplayer but when I saw the destruction system in bc2 I said to myself that how good and fun this mp can be! And it was.
After that I mostly played bc2 mp just because of destruction system.

And one thing that I have to mention is in bc2 weapons has character by their sound. Each one the weapons in bc2 has a unique and completely different sound compare to other guns.

The first time I played bf3, I noticed that sound of guns in it are a little similar to each other.


And the destruction system is fading out in new battlefield games after bc2. You won't find a map in other bfs that completely destroy after one game (something like oasis or arica harbor in bc2).

I agree, I think the Dolby Digital partnership that DICE had going on with Bad Company 2 and Frostbite engine during that development period is really what ended up making all of the sounds in BC2 sound so incredible. Everything in the game in general is just good to be honest.

[Cheap-o]

Long story short.
Everything good gets bought out, and ruined from the top.
The developers themselves are just powerless wimps who can only follow orders.
Once they figured out how profitable the gaming industry was compared to the movie industry, they immediately began their malicious and despicable business practice here in my favorite platform of entertainment.
Games were good in the past because it was made with soul and passion and to give people ENTERTAINMENT.
Now everything is just a soul-less cash grab, microtransactions, gambling ethics, episodic DLC release (they ruined Hitman, my beloved gamed) and in-game currency.
Monopoly studios buy out smaller studios and dominate, thus shutting down the production of a possible game release.

How can I say this without getting banned.....
Okay so the same corrupt breed of people that rule and dominate in California....
they now rule and dominate the videogame game industry with their web of influence.
Things in their hands immediately turn to dung and dirt because they themselves cannot maintain culture, for they only know how to buy out and destroy.
They are greedy and evil people that are more interested in power, wealth, and one world dominance and do not have any interest at all in videogames, all they see is a potential to conduct business and to operate another way of controlling media and promoting propaganda, after all, millions of people are viewing and trying to have fun with their lives.
Okay f it I am just going to say it.
Freemasons and J3ws.
These sad Freemasons want people to believe that multiculturalism is good, and will use their money to bribe and shill, to promote multicultural characters in games, because in order for them to get a One World Order, they have to destroy the individuals ability to recognize race and nationality.
The J3ws, once again, they conduct their Talmud business practice of exploiting people, they are not bound to any soil, they roam around the world masquerading as citizens, worm their way into power, and began destroying the host nation from within.
The mighty Roman empire fell because of these people, now it is the United States's turn.

[Lebhleb]

Now, i haven't played, all BF's [3 or bad company 1 but that one was on console, and 1942 i only had little epxerience with it] And i thought they were all good and fun, of course as much as i do like destroying the map and grenade launching everyone, i do feel like neither of BF games are bad and that they are enjoyable. Added a they at end

[{SVK}Puškin]

This game is simply great but it has some issues.

[$𝖒𝔬𝗸𝖊]

I honestly think Sheep/Hoard mentality will gravitate towards newer games not realizing that ones that came out in 2010 like Bad Company 2 or Modern Warfare Remastered (2016) are better... In fact, Call of Duty developers were AT LEAST aware of the fact that their COD4 title was the best-deemed title they've come out with and they actually did a remaster of the 2007 cod4 in 2016, with Modern Warfare (cod4) remastered. DICE developers just gave up on their most beloved franchise and hoped that it would just die off with the years going by as they produced more yawn-inducing garbage like BF1, BFV, Hardline, etc.

Why is it so difficult to listen to your community for DICE and ESPECIALLY EA? Jackfrags himself, a proponent and sponsor of DICE for their games is supposed to be nonbiased and he always shines BC2 in a positive light compared to the other recent Battlefields. That aside, I just find it a little daunting how a 2010 game is better than any Battlefield game from 2012-2019, but I must just be "reminiscing or nostalgia chasing," meanwhile no actual good modern Battlefield has come since MAYBE Battlefield 3 and Bad Company 2, since BF4 was just a $60 expansion pack of BF3. Let's just release more grandpa, historically backwards shooters that everyone seems to enjoy so much.

And another thing, other battlefields after Bad Company 2 just had more useless details, not any type of new gameplay or innovative additions like Bad Company 2 did with ACTUAL destruction capable of having any building and any wall in the game being destructible. It seems DICE think if they add useless details in the game, their game becomes a better title. I agree the REALITY part will be ok by this, but people want to have fun in the game. In the middle of battle who cares that your gun gets dirty by mud around you?! No one! People even won't pay attention to it when there is a tank in front of them. Bottom line, bring back the good Battlefield, and I am afraid that judging by how Battlefield looks today that they might ruin any Bad Company 2 remaster or even a Bad Company 3, I would be fine with it as long as we get a sequel to BC2 at least if it was at least somewhat, if not better than BC2 in terms of feel, quality, destruction, multiplayer, etc.

[Good Onion]

The thing AK47Ccommunist said about money in game industry is completely true, more true when you talk about EA.
This company don't want developers to make innovative things. For them good means more income.THAT'S why they killed MoH franchise. That's why we don't have dead space 4.
It's all because EA think to do something and it force developers to do it, and when developers forced, they either won't do it (which cause destroying your game or closing your company) or they just say ok. They (ea) just need more and more money and they do whatever they can to earn it but, they forget one way which is listen to your customers, see what they like and do that for them.




And MLGonthorian, at least put the name of the original author of those lines in your comment.

[BigN'TastyRIP]

I miss the days playing bfbc2 with my friends back on the 360, good times.

[$𝖒𝔬𝗸𝖊]

Originally posted by BigN'TastyRIP:

I miss the days playing bfbc2 with my friends back on the 360, good times.

I agree, I spent more time with my irl friends playing bfbc2 on the ps3, but it's just as fun on the PC version as well, I like training mouse skill with fps games on PC as well.

[BILLY THE PUPPET MASTER]

Indeed,The franchise completely went downhill after BC2,Still waiting for Bad Company 3 though,I know its coming...Its only a matter of time....

[Lebhleb]

Even if we get BC 3, that doesn't mean it will be good.

[Good Onion]

yeah. there is no guaranty for BC3 to be as good as BC2 or better than it.

but we have to wait and see what DICE want to do with next bf.