Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I do not think SKS is a marksman's rifle, I think SKS is there for low recoil alternative to unmodded AKM.
The SKS is broken if we are using real world standards.
It's also found in FN HQ storage room on rare occasions.
3.2 MOA is quite acceptable for a rifle sitting in some random South East Asia warehouse at least after the Vietnam war, it is quite decent if you intend to shoot your enemy not beyond 150 meter/ yards. However, you might as well use AKM with the PBS silencer since the accuracy isn’t too far off. (3.5 ish) This “poor man’s Vintorez” build has stayed with me quite a while after I leave starter town till I get M4 with silencer. Though using US round which is common on tier 2 goons the gun needs to zero if you want to hit any enemies beyond 200 meter as the drop is crazy, and US isn’t guaranteed penetrate on IIIA armor.
Though, I could use a SKS with stripper clip.
Exactly. And there will be no legit source of russians considering it to use it as a DMR. 7,62x39 sucks on longer ranges. And most plattforms that do under 4 MOA are considered to be extremly accurate for the 7,62x39mm round. In this case a leftover vietnam war SKS shouldnt even have something under 4 MOA.
The 7.62x39's lack of accuracy argument is largely western propaganda, a fantasy that is not supported by ballistic testing. There can be environmental performance differences between the variants of 7.62x39, and even quality differences between brands, but overall, it is a highly accurate round with significantly greater ranger and armor penetration than the standard 5.56 of the American military, which is now being phased out.
The SKS has been shown to reliably and accurately hit targets as far as 400 meters, with iron sights that can be zeroed out to 1,000 meters, which is not practical only because of the limitations of human eye sight.
The recoil of an SKS is also very easy to control, it is just a really well produced refile with a notoriously cheap price tag, at least at the time. Now days, authentic SKS rifles are often incredibly expensive, ranging from 600 to 4,000 depending on condition, authenticity, production date, and nation of origin.
The only troll here is you.
A lot of rifles back in those days had 1000 meter settings for iron sights. It was basically a last ditch effort for soldiers to put rounds on target from far away. Hitting an enemy at that distance came down to luck and volume of fire. A lot of military doctrine from back then is out of date because it was shown to be ineffective. I don't know why you insist that the SKS should be a DMR type weapon when it's not and never had the potential to be. The Soviets made the SVD in 7.62x54R because x39 couldn't match the range of 7.62 NATO and the SKS just didn't have the mechanical accuracy to fulfill that role. I'm guessing you're hung up on it being semi auto and therefore it must be a DMR but it's just not that kind of rifle. There are reasons why it fell out of service relatively quickly.
I insist because the only reason it was never used as a DMR is because it was designed to be a temporary solution, a quick fix, until more promising candidates were invented, and the fact that Russia seriously considered using it as a DMR. The SKS did not become one of the most mass produced rifles in history just for the laughs.
7.62x39 and 7.62x51 are not the same round, so obviously they perform differently, duh. That said, the claim that 7.62 is less accurate than 5.56 for its intended purpose is a persistent lie told by die hard AR fanboys.
Examples of DMRs chambered in 7.62x39:
M10X-DMR
Tabuk Sniper Rifle
Norinco Type 81 SR
CMMG MK47 Resolute
It is important to keep in mind that a DMR is not a sniper, they serve different roles.
So I guess you're wrong again, and I didn't even reply to you, not sure why people saying SKS is inaccurate rent free in your head but feel free proving us wrong about how soviet service rifle with bayonet as default is far more accurate anything modern firearms manufacturers
with advance machine can put on the counter, or whatever you like to claim as I don't bother to read all your tex
Like for example, your own SKS shooting video at 400 meter, and I'll go easy on you for the Huey size target at 1000 meter. Be sure you also have an AR-15 to shoot so we will know the difference.