Installa Steam
Accedi
|
Lingua
简体中文 (cinese semplificato)
繁體中文 (cinese tradizionale)
日本語 (giapponese)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandese)
Български (bulgaro)
Čeština (ceco)
Dansk (danese)
Deutsch (tedesco)
English (inglese)
Español - España (spagnolo - Spagna)
Español - Latinoamérica (spagnolo dell'America Latina)
Ελληνικά (greco)
Français (francese)
Indonesiano
Magyar (ungherese)
Nederlands (olandese)
Norsk (norvegese)
Polski (polacco)
Português (portoghese - Portogallo)
Português - Brasil (portoghese brasiliano)
Română (rumeno)
Русский (russo)
Suomi (finlandese)
Svenska (svedese)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraino)
Segnala un problema nella traduzione
what did I do for it?
The game uses AVX2 and this can cause CPUs that are undervolted, e.g. with the curve optimizer, to crash.
I found with CoreCycler/y-Cruncher/prime95 that the CPU was not stable with AVX2, with FFT size "All" and with the y-Cruncher mode "19-ZN2 ~ Kagari" and a runtime per CPU core of 15 minutes . If you undervolted normally with SSE and the FFT size Huge, everything ran stable, but that wasn't enough for gzw.
The old undervolting settings were stable enough for all games and benchmarks over days, but not stable enough for AVX2/GZW.
TLTR: the cpu must not be undervolted so severely, the settings must be able to withstand AVX2.
I tested the whole thing for stability with CoreCycler 0.9.5.0alpha2 and haven't had any crashes since then.
Starting the game as an administrator doesn't hurt either.
If anyone would like to have the exact settings for CoreCyler, I can share them.
temps are fine, cpu is never over 65°C, cooled by an artic liquid freezer II 420 AIO with 6 fans (push/pull), and the gpu temps are ok too, no thermal throttel
is anybody reading the post? No its not the psu, as i wrote, it was the undervolting, it wasnt stable with avx2.
yeah I tried that curve optimizer stuff and all it did was make my system unstable every so often especially at the lower clocks (which is counter intuitive) normally systems are unstable at high clocks but what ends up happening with the optimizer is you get less power at low clocks as well, theres ways around that but after running some tests and actually getting less performance with the optimizer versus no optimizer....
theres also the fact that I'm gpu limited in 4K and practicially 0 difference if im 3.7GHz or 4.6GHz.
I think undervolting and lowering TDP is actually the new field of overclocking, which is funny if you think about it because its the polar opposite.
I much prefer running 48-52c 1v under load than 78-90c 1.45v in the game.
glad you got it sorted.
that is not normal behavior, something is running to hot - your PSU is not up to the task for the 4090 - or your RAM is mismatched pairs, overpopulated slots and/or incorrect voltage or timings. I'm betting you also have overclocked RAM out the box and isn't playing nice.
Check thermals, could be overheating. What cooler do you have ? What CPU other than "the best in slot"
You sound really lame. It can entirely be the game that doesnt work well with a system. Instead of a system not working well with a game.
Your profile picture doesn't appear mature, so I will make an effort to be nicer than you.
Are you attempting to assist someone, sharing about your gaming experience, or simply trying to come across as a philosophical arrogant?
Played twenty eight hours since no issue, couldn't even start a mission before.
Be-Quiet Dark Power Pro, maybe more manufacturers do this.
Yea this sounds like a common multi-rail PSU setup where "A" and "B" refer to different power rails that can output a limited amount of amps on specific connectors. Typically you want to either separate out your CPU/Mobo and GPU connectors onto different rails, or split evenly across rails (depends on the PSU) to prevent overcurrent protection from tripping.