Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
As far as we know there won't be a Single player or offline mode. The extent will go to PvE servers later on once everything is done and prepared.
Six Days of Fallujah has exactly that problem: If you try alone, you can, but it's awfully hard and will frustrate the majority of the playerbase if you title the game with "Soloplay". So they keep the settings for singleplayers, but will implement friendly bots later.
Scaling enemy amount and difficulty could ease this pain a bit, would be interested as well, if devs think about that stuff (e.g. server with an avg. of 4 players against a server where 16 players work together - will the setting on the server scale/adept or will it be super hard with few people while super easy with a full team?).
No, PvE itself is not necessarily single player - although single player must always be PvE. PvE only means Player/s -vs- Environment (bots) - so if you think about that you realize that a player can play against bots either by himself OR with other players on his team - either way it's PvE. so while we will be able to play player vs bots we do not yet know how well, or not, the difficulty will scale down for a single player.
You've obviously never played a decent Arma3 mission.
But regardless, if you have nothing constructive to contribute to the discussion then why not just move on? Seems silly to put others down just to suit your own personal issues.
PvE is quite literally offline without opposing players. PvPvE is online with opposing players. . . .
Devs have already confirmed that PvE will be their dedicated mode without opposing players in these servers, but can still be played in co-op.
If the A.I is anywhere near as brutal as Tarkov, then it won't even matter.
Too add, some people really don't want to deal with cheaters in PvPvE games. I would prefer to play in PvPvE servers in GrayZone, but if cheaters are going to ruin the experience, I got no problem going into a PvE servers with friends.
Grayzone will have dedicated PvE servers without other players for PvP, but I still believe you have to be connected to their servers.
Even though, yes you have to be online to connect to a PvE server, PvE servers are not competitive and will not have any type of PvP in them. in a PvP server, you have a 0% chance of being killed by an actual enemy player. Their PvE servers are designed for solo players who want to play the story and those who want to play only co-op; who DON'T want PvP engagements. If players want PvP engagments, they will have to join a PvPvE severs, hence PvP. This has already been confirmed by the devs, so don't understand why you keep trying to argue that there might be PvP in PvE servers.
On top of all of that not sure where you gathered that PvE in games hints that's there's going to be PvP. Every open world PvE game I have ever played doesn't have PvP unless it specifically says PvPvE.