Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Also armors, weapons and skills skins will change once you level them up.
At lvl 45-50 almost all upgrades are unlocked and evry class looks awesome.
It is also alot better than Gauntlet. But it is a Gauntlet-type game.
For full enjoyment it has also 2 extra storyline and 2 extra hero DLCs. Both worth getting.
Same thing kinda happened with diablo 3 upon release. A lot of people expected it to be exactly like diablo 2 but better graphics. So they didn't like the rune skill system, they didn't like that skills were unlocked by leveling, they didn't like that stat points were removed, that mercenaries couldn't be brought to multiplayer, that there wasn't any pvp, that there was no runewords, no horadic cube, no gamble, small inventory, that not all areas where completely seeded squares of monsters and so on.
People even complained about the look of Diablo himself. And that game is still really close to the previous 2 games. So logic dictates that this one would be recieved even worse.