Cheap cash grab. Stop supporting this!

[lastbreath]

When developers care we get TR: Anniversary
When developers don't give a heck we get cheap remasters.
Stop supporting this trend. You moan gaming industry is collapsing, but you are the reason. It is always consumer who dictates the rules of the market. And if the market is full of crap, it happens because consumers are ready to eat it.

[UnfriendlyGuy01]

Anniversary is trash, this is better

[☠Dragnoros, der Wächter]

i like the game... it's not perfect but But 30€ for 3 games is fine... better than these 70€ DLC's.

[dprog1995]

Originally posted by UnfriendlyGuy01:

Anniversary is trash, this is better

Anni has much better "modern controls and camera" though.

[Kacki Ben]

just stfu

[Marcelo Sampaio]

Funny thing is that THIS is what I wanted from a true TR remaster.

Anniversary isn't BAD, but it is a downgrade compared to the original TR (except for graphics, of course). And it is from that era when gamers needed handholding, so the game is more streamlined. And also QTE! I HATE QTEs.

Also this remaster is anything but "cheap cash grab". It replaces almost every texture (and MOST of them look great), all character models and even adds new effects like more realistic rain, snow falling through cracks, water puddles (with reflection), better lightning, etc.

[roachit]

The platforms aren't magnetized and there is no yellow paint to tell me where to go! I'm going insaaaaaaaaaane!

[☠Dragnoros, der Wächter]

Originally posted by roachit:

The platforms aren't magnetized and there is no yellow paint to tell me where to go! I'm going insaaaaaaaaaane!

This young generation should suffer like we older ones did around 2000. XD HAHAHAHAHAA

[☠Dragnoros, der Wächter]

Originally posted by BurnBird:

So, I can play some of my favorite games of all time in modern resolutions and without issues, as well as not having to manually install the expansions. Not to mention the optional graphical enhancements. All of this for free since I already owned TR1-3 previously. And I should be upset about this because...?

according to others, precisely for this reason. And because many have problems with the "new controls"

[GnomeSlayer]

Originally posted by lastbreath:

When developers care we get TR: Anniversary
When developers don't give a heck we get cheap remasters.
Stop supporting this trend. You moan gaming industry is collapsing, but you are the reason. It is always consumer who dictates the rules of the market. And if the market is full of crap, it happens because consumers are ready to eat it.

What are the differences between the various versions. I am lost with so many remakes and remasters.

[GnomeSlayer]

Originally posted by Marcelo Sampaio:

Funny thing is that THIS is what I wanted from a true TR remaster.

Anniversary isn't BAD, but it is a downgrade compared to the original TR (except for graphics, of course). And it is from that era when gamers needed handholding, so the game is more streamlined. And also QTE! I HATE QTEs.

Also this remaster is anything but "cheap cash grab". It replaces almost every texture (and MOST of them look great), all character models and even adds new effects like more realistic rain, snow falling through cracks, water puddles (with reflection), better lightning, etc.

Can you please explain what are the differences between the various versions. I am lost with so many remakes and remasters.

[Mortal_Kasi]

Originally posted by lastbreath:

When developers care we get TR: Anniversary
When developers don't give a heck we get cheap remasters.
Stop supporting this trend. You moan gaming industry is collapsing, but you are the reason. It is always consumer who dictates the rules of the market. And if the market is full of crap, it happens because consumers are ready to eat it.

I liked anniversary and had fun with the reboot Trilogy, but the developers do not care, have you seen the new unified Lara design? She looks like Dude! CD doe's not care about you or Lara Croft at all.

Oh and by the way, Anniversary was a Remake, this is a Remaster. There is a little difference, if you expected a Remake it is not the fault of aspyr or the game.

[webcider]

Originally posted by lastbreath:

When developers care we get TR: Anniversary
When developers don't give a heck we get cheap remasters.
Stop supporting this trend. You moan gaming industry is collapsing, but you are the reason. It is always consumer who dictates the rules of the market. And if the market is full of crap, it happens because consumers are ready to eat it.

sounds like your full of yourself... go play some palworld buddy

[Kenjara]

Its the almost perfect remaster for me. I don't see it as a cash grab at all. Its a hassle free way to play all 3 games with all the content whilst looking better. What else would you want? Hell it even runs in 4k 60FPS on the deck.

As usual OP does not even have the game.

[Arbe]

Originally posted by roachit:

The platforms aren't magnetized and there is no yellow paint to tell me where to go! I'm going insaaaaaaaaaane!

welcome to 1996

[☠Dragnoros, der Wächter]

Well... we should actually draw a line between the young players and the older players.

I think the remaster is almost perfect for us older players. We feel younger again and we can cope with the controls, as many of us had already played on PS1 and PC. (I probably speak for many). We don't even have problems with bugs in the game, because we already know them and love them. (by the way, we probably still know the games by heart so it's easier for us to play this)

For the younger players it's worse because the controls are not like many other games today and the new controls are actually very unfamiliar.

You also have to realise that the Tomb Raider of today and back then are completely different worlds.

You can understand both opinions, but these fronts will always form with such games