Lmfao at the fanbois and terrible performance

[Tr0w]

from the Steam reviews
"runs at a solid 30fps at 4k on 7900xt gpu 5900x cpu 32gb of ddr4 ram"
"I'm getting 50fps @ 4K with 4080 Super while running DLSS Balanced and Frame Generation"

Imagine being happy with Series X performance on £700-£1000+ GPUs.

[Rytir]

I personally didn't see an issue with the performance with my setup. I mean maxed out with DLAA and getting 80 to just a little over 90 at 5120x1440 works for the type of game.

[Tr0w]

Diposting pertama kali oleh Outback Santa:

Diposting pertama kali oleh Tr0w:

You are being disingenuous, i explained why, they can get the same framerate on a £400-£500 console as they're getting on £700+ and £1000 GPUs, yet they are thrilled to get 30fps on said expensive hardware.

no I'm not. you falsely assume that console users are that much different from high-end pc owners. they both care to see the next generation graphics just so they can have a benchmark for their brick.

and like I asked before why does this in anyway surprise you? the people in question got the cinematic benchmark they were looking for and they are happy with it.

If it was any other title providing a 30fps experience on a 7900XT or 4080 Super, the reviews section would be a bloodbath and you know it. This is some serious licking of MS/Xbox's boots.

[patrick68794]

Diposting pertama kali oleh B1gD4ddy:

the performance is not good.
it's a graphically demanding game, yes, but the performance could still be a bit better.
in the starting area i see 40-50fps with 4090oc/7950x3d at 4k hdr dlaa everything maxed out and variable rate shading disbaled.

The game has ray tracing and is hands down the most graphically impressive game available lol anyone expecting 60fps at 4K with current GPUs only has themselves to blame for being disappointed. Did you also get upset when you couldn't get 60fps in Cyberpunk or Alan Wake 2 with RT at native 4K? What about the new Avatar game? Or even the new Lords of the Fallen? Hellblade 2 looks better than all of those games and runs just as well or better.

[Jrm]

On UE5 maxed out you are going to want to turn on both Frame Gen and Upscale. UE5 is next gen, even the next gen rtx gpu's won't be able to max this game out at 4k native and get over 100+ fps at all times.

[Zebedee]

Seen a few dips in framerate, tied to transitions in scenes, but otherwise it's been pretty fine for me. Did have to turn on vsync to help with some tearing, and there is a bit of noticeable pop-in of foliage etc. on the big camera sweeps as they zoom in. Nothing I'd consider a major issue.

I'm at 1440p with a 3080ti though, and I think the specs hinted at that being more than plenty for maxed out with DLAA.

[Dumar]

Diposting pertama kali oleh Tr0w:

from the Steam reviews
"runs at a solid 30fps at 4k on 7900xt gpu 5900x cpu 32gb of ddr4 ram"
"I'm getting 50fps @ 4K with 4080 Super while running DLSS Balanced and Frame Generation"

Imagine being happy with Series X performance on £700-£1000+ GPUs.

I don't know.

Hellblade 1 runs awful on PC today, yes, the RTX edition. So much stutter, traverse and compile, all over, throughout the entire experience. Jarring and annoying.

Hellblade 2, incredible and honest performance.

Game IS demanding, but runs flawlessly.

To this day, Alan Wake 2, is the MOST demanding modern gen title, period.

This game will be playable at or slightly above 60 fps, without Framegen on a 4090. DLSS Quality will raise the bar another 15-20fps at 80-90 ish FPS.

Framegen will keep you well above 120 FPS at 4k.

4080's / 4090's are playing at high frames with max settings.

[Jrm]

Diposting pertama kali oleh Dumar:

Diposting pertama kali oleh Tr0w:

from the Steam reviews
"runs at a solid 30fps at 4k on 7900xt gpu 5900x cpu 32gb of ddr4 ram"
"I'm getting 50fps @ 4K with 4080 Super while running DLSS Balanced and Frame Generation"

Imagine being happy with Series X performance on £700-£1000+ GPUs.

I don't know.

Hellblade 1 runs awful on PC today, yes, the RTX edition. So much stutter, traverse and compile, all over, throughout the entire experience. Jarring and annoying.

Hellblade 2, incredible and honest performance.

Game IS demanding, but runs flawlessly.

To this day, Alan Wake 2, is the MOST demanding modern gen title, period.

This game will be playable at or slightly above 60 fps, without Framegen on a 4090. DLSS Quality will raise the bar another 15-20fps at 80-90 ish FPS.

Framegen will keep you well above 120 FPS at 4k.

4080's / 4090's are playing at high frames with max settings.

Amd higher end gpus are running this game extremely well too. Even an older 6950xt is matching the performance of an rtx 4080 in this game at native. Once you turn on FG and upscale to match that of the nvidia 4080 equivalent it will outperform it.

https://i.postimg.cc/vZNhHr8h/hellblade-2-bench.jpg

[bufu]

Diposting pertama kali oleh patrick68794:

Diposting pertama kali oleh B1gD4ddy:

the performance is not good.
it's a graphically demanding game, yes, but the performance could still be a bit better.
in the starting area i see 40-50fps with 4090oc/7950x3d at 4k hdr dlaa everything maxed out and variable rate shading disbaled.

The game has ray tracing and is hands down the most graphically impressive game available lol anyone expecting 60fps at 4K with current GPUs only has themselves to blame for being disappointed. Did you also get upset when you couldn't get 60fps in Cyberpunk or Alan Wake 2 with RT at native 4K? What about the new Avatar game? Or even the new Lords of the Fallen? Hellblade 2 looks better than all of those games and runs just as well or better.

ever tested cyberpunk with pathtracing ? its blows this game out of the water be a mile

[Tr0w]

Diposting pertama kali oleh Jrm:

On UE5 maxed out you are going to want to turn on both Frame Gen and Upscale. UE5 is next gen, even the next gen rtx gpu's won't be able to max this game out at 4k native and get over 100+ fps at all times.

UE5 is a ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ made for console engine for lazy devs that just want to drop scans everywhere and forget.
Everything made on it is a stuttery mess on PC.

[Star Rain]

I swear Ryse looks better then this, i mean come on look at the battle raging in level 1 of that game.

[Dumar]

Diposting pertama kali oleh Jrm:

Diposting pertama kali oleh Dumar:

I don't know.

Hellblade 1 runs awful on PC today, yes, the RTX edition. So much stutter, traverse and compile, all over, throughout the entire experience. Jarring and annoying.

Hellblade 2, incredible and honest performance.

Game IS demanding, but runs flawlessly.

To this day, Alan Wake 2, is the MOST demanding modern gen title, period.

This game will be playable at or slightly above 60 fps, without Framegen on a 4090. DLSS Quality will raise the bar another 15-20fps at 80-90 ish FPS.

Framegen will keep you well above 120 FPS at 4k.

4080's / 4090's are playing at high frames with max settings.

Amd higher end gpus are running this game extremely well too. Even an older 6950xt is matching the performance of an rtx 4080 in this game at native. Once you turn on FG and upscale to match that of the nvidia 4080 equivalent it will outperform it.

https://i.postimg.cc/vZNhHr8h/hellblade-2-bench.jpg

Yea, thats goodstuff for AMD too.

Solid optimization, a first on UE5 in a lonnnnnnnnnng time for PC.

Optimization this time around for a PORT that's on UE5 on PC, its actually a GOOD, performative port.

Extremely impressive -- Now... The combat and Gameplay is a whollllle other topic, sigh... Big sigh.

Diposting pertama kali oleh Tr0w:

Diposting pertama kali oleh Jrm:

On UE5 maxed out you are going to want to turn on both Frame Gen and Upscale. UE5 is next gen, even the next gen rtx gpu's won't be able to max this game out at 4k native and get over 100+ fps at all times.

UE5 is a ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ made for console engine for lazy devs that just want to drop scans everywhere and forget.
Everything made on it is a stuttery mess on PC.

Yes, in general, I'd agree with you.

But this port is incredible on PC. The performance is not a stuttery mess, and I 'know' it did a compile step in the first 20-seconds because I saw my CPU (14700k) jump to 200wats and all cores hit 98-99 usage for about 12 or so seconds.

The process was fast, and the game itself runs like a charm - I honestly was worried for another disaster, but that is NOT the case. First proper UE5 game on PC... about facking time.

[patrick68794]

Diposting pertama kali oleh bufu:

Diposting pertama kali oleh patrick68794:

The game has ray tracing and is hands down the most graphically impressive game available lol anyone expecting 60fps at 4K with current GPUs only has themselves to blame for being disappointed. Did you also get upset when you couldn't get 60fps in Cyberpunk or Alan Wake 2 with RT at native 4K? What about the new Avatar game? Or even the new Lords of the Fallen? Hellblade 2 looks better than all of those games and runs just as well or better.

ever tested cyberpunk with pathtracing ? its blows this game out of the water be a mile

lol no it doesn't. Alan Wake 2 with path tracing is also more impressive than Cyberpunk to begin with.

[patrick68794]

Diposting pertama kali oleh Dumar:

Diposting pertama kali oleh Jrm:

Amd higher end gpus are running this game extremely well too. Even an older 6950xt is matching the performance of an rtx 4080 in this game at native. Once you turn on FG and upscale to match that of the nvidia 4080 equivalent it will outperform it.

https://i.postimg.cc/vZNhHr8h/hellblade-2-bench.jpg

Yea, thats goodstuff for AMD too.

Solid optimization, a first on UE5 in a lonnnnnnnnnng time for PC.

Optimization this time around for a PORT that's on UE5 on PC, its actually a GOOD, performative port.

Extremely impressive -- Now... The combat and Gameplay is a whollllle other topic, sigh... Big sigh.

Diposting pertama kali oleh Tr0w:

UE5 is a ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ made for console engine for lazy devs that just want to drop scans everywhere and forget.
Everything made on it is a stuttery mess on PC.

Yes, in general, I'd agree with you.

But this port is incredible on PC. The performance is not a stuttery mess, and I 'know' it did a compile step in the first 20-seconds because I saw my CPU (14700k) jump to 200wats and all cores hit 98-99 usage for about 12 or so seconds.

The process was fast, and the game itself runs like a charm - I honestly was worried for another disaster, but that is NOT the case. First proper UE5 game on PC... about facking time.

The Layers of Fear remake in UE5 was really good too. With RT enabled I get an almost locked 120fps at native 4K with no stuttering.

[Dumar]

Diposting pertama kali oleh patrick68794:

Diposting pertama kali oleh Dumar:

Yea, thats goodstuff for AMD too.

Solid optimization, a first on UE5 in a lonnnnnnnnnng time for PC.

Optimization this time around for a PORT that's on UE5 on PC, its actually a GOOD, performative port.

Extremely impressive -- Now... The combat and Gameplay is a whollllle other topic, sigh... Big sigh.



Yes, in general, I'd agree with you.

But this port is incredible on PC. The performance is not a stuttery mess, and I 'know' it did a compile step in the first 20-seconds because I saw my CPU (14700k) jump to 200wats and all cores hit 98-99 usage for about 12 or so seconds.

The process was fast, and the game itself runs like a charm - I honestly was worried for another disaster, but that is NOT the case. First proper UE5 game on PC... about facking time.

The Layers of Fear remake in UE5 was really good too. With RT enabled I get an almost locked 120fps at native 4K with no stuttering.

Thanks mate, I gotta check this game out - I was on the fence with Layers of Fear.

[Maximum Games]

I had to choose an AMD video card...

https://en.gamegpu.com/action-/-fps-/-tps/senua-s-saga-hellblade-ii-test-gpu-cpu