Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
EDIT you don't get a 2nd chance to make a 1st impression
Also an invalid benchmark tool makes it a lot easier to get a refund beyond the 2 hour rule. Since any benchmark that doesn't actually reflect the game it's bench marking is by definition a false advert. You can make the argument that troubleshooting the problem kicked you over. If it's reasoned enough with steps taken, it's an area Steam/Valve in the past has been forgiving of.
From comparison video's I'm seeing it appears the benchmark was optimized differently than the tittle itself was......that is incredibly stupid if accurate
no u
This shows once again that player count doesn't matter at all when you deliver a terrible game. Avowed has a small community, but at least 77% of the players like the game.
Imagine releasing a game, getting 1 million players, and more than 500.000 people think your game sucks, lol.
A hoonter must hoont
Part of me wonders if the people complaining about optimization are playing with the high res texture pack when their machine can't eke it out.
EDIT I can almost promise you it's had a cooling effect on 1st day sales as a lot of people are now in the wait and see camp, and there is likely a time limit b4 they wander off to something else.
I would also caution those devs from using the "upgrade your rig" defense TH tried that with SF and it backfired.( a number of successful (late) refunds used that clip and a screen shot of the recommended settings for a quick turn around) Your minimum/recommended config label is accurate, or it isn't. Your benchmark tool is either accurate or it isn't. This is not something you should ever ever "pad" unless you really really like handing out refunds. As it's easy to document, and easy to show a bad faith agreement. Most things in gaming can be subjective, this far less so with a little due diligence on the users end.
My gut tells me the recommended for the base game is low balled, what they have labeled seems awfully low to me for this game(it's incredibly asset intensive). If i'm correct the blow back isn't really surprising, or undeserved. 2k series,hell I would a thought mid 3 was iffy, for this in recommended just seems off(minimum sure, but not recommended)...what were they running in their test set up a 4 M clock? It wasn't a stock card I can promise that, not if they got anything close to what I would consider a "recommended" performance curve. And if so I have absolutely no sympathy at all for them for the resulting push back. Say what you mean, mean what you say
I am positive that others will choose MH: Wilds.
I am positive some will choose Kingdom Come Deliverance 2.
I am positive that many will choose games not yet released.
I don't need some media outlet, The Game Awards or other players to determine my opinion for me.
Anyway, Avowed is getting better reviews.