Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Others also had initially positive previews of games like Redfall too.
Basically, previews mean very little than that. It's a preview. Like a trailer to a movie. And likewise, you can't judge the entire movie based on a trailer or preview.
Wait for his and others' proper reviews and actual gamer experience.
so now the next step is for me to play it and judge it myself. that is all there is ands howe gaming is done. beside veilguard was decent in terms of gameplay and story. the whole controversy about the game is centered on a skipable side quest. out side of that it was a fun game.
funny thing though, people say the writing was bad, but bioware writing has been the same since da origins. none of them were better then the other. mid at best. still fun though.
Yeah, they've done a good job showing gameplay early (and adjusting to feedback), better than a lot of companies out there. Everything seems to indicate they're just doing their normal Obsidian thing. No one knew what Veilguard was gonna end up being, with a whole new team in charge and a ten year gap (and being too tone-deaf). It's still Josh Sawyer and Feargus Urquhart (and Tim Cain, part-time) guiding the boat at Obsidian, these are the guys who have been doing this forever. They deserve more trust than this.
See, this is what I mean. His REVIEW of both was negative. Skillup's PREVIEW was very positive, though it wasn't done by him specifically he still saw it and approved it and echoed the commentary that it looked good until he actually got to play it.
You're literally missing the entire point, chad. Way to slap yourself on the face, especially about "speaking nonsense' lmao.
Some people, seriously. Thanks for the free points though.
Both of those games had tons of video and even previews. Concord had an early access event they eventually made openly free to all. Redfall had a raw gameplay preview a month or two early from IGN, which is where ridicule started mounting.
This is insane to say. In fact, there's probably been twice as much Veilguard marketing right now as there has been for Avowed. People are actually criticizing how little marketing it's getting.
Avowed, on the other hand, I've watched the showcases multiple times, plus some of the other videos, and I'm like "yeah, that's what I want out of a game." So even if it's objectively a mid game it's probably still near the top of my list at the end of the year. Looking better than Outer Worlds, and even with its flaws I was pretty darn happy with that one.
It was just so rough to get through the first half of the first one before it got interesting.
But he praised combat and team work in combat and story and choices and characters in Veilguard in the same "6-hour preview" or whatever you call it. So nah, pass.
Never trust "previews" anyway. It's just a prefiltered access content.
Cus they like to go to wherever the wind is blowing. So yeah, not reliable.